Prediction of activation energy for combustion and pyrolysis by means of machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Kartal, Furkan [1 ]
Ozveren, Ugur [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Goztepe Campus, TR-34722 Kadikoy, Turkey
关键词
Machine learning; ANN; Activation energy; Fuel properties; Pyrolysis; Combustion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is a widely used technique to determine the activation energy (Ea), which is an important parameter for thermochemical processes. Thus, researchers have recently developed computational methods to minimize the experimental effort. While there are some studies on estimating kinetic parameters such as Ea using artificial neural networks (ANN), these are insufficient for generalization because they involve only one or two operational parameters. Therefore, in this study, Ea estimation was performed by creating a realistic ANN model as a machine learning approach, including operating parameters that were not previously considered. TGA experiments were performed with biomass, coal, and blends under different operating conditions for the training and test data sets of the model. In order for the ANN to give a satisfactory result, the experimental results were enriched with the data from the literature. The dataset was analyzed using statistical tools like correlation map, feature importance etc. Then a feedforward neural network was developed using LevenbergMarquardt optimization algorithm.As a result, by using an appropriate number of input variables and a sufficient amount of data, it was possible to conduct a reliable TGA simulation to calculate the Ea values, with R2 values greater than 0.96 and mean absolute percentage error values<20%. Furthermore, the results of the statistical analysis applied to the input parameters of the ANN model were found to be consistent with the scientific background. The initial and final temperatures of decomposition are the most significant parameters for the determination of Ea.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine learning-driven product prediction and process optimization for catalytic pyrolysis of polyolefin plastics
    Li, Hualiang
    Wu, Zhenzhen
    He, Hongyuan
    Feng, Shi
    Zhou, Yunqing
    Shi, Chuanqi
    Tu, Xin
    Yan, Jianhua
    Zhang, Hao
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 333
  • [22] Machine learning prediction of higher heating value of biochar based on biomass characteristics and pyrolysis conditions
    Wang, Minghong
    Xie, Yingpu
    Gao, Yong
    Huang, Xiaohong
    Wei, Chen
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 395
  • [23] Enhancing pyrolysis process monitoring and prediction for biomass: A machine learning approach
    Liu, Jingxin
    Lyu, Huafei
    Cheng, Can
    Xu, Ziming
    Zhang, Wenjuan
    FUEL, 2024, 362
  • [24] Thermogravimetric experiments based prediction of biomass pyrolysis behavior: A comparison of typical machine learning regression models in Scikit-learn
    Zhong, Yu
    Liu, Fahang
    Huang, Guozhe
    Zhang, Juan
    Li, Changhai
    Ding, Yanming
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2024, 202
  • [25] Application of Multilayer Extreme Learning Machine for Efficient Building Energy Prediction
    Adegoke, Muideen
    Hafiz, Alaka
    Ajayi, Saheed
    Olu-Ajayi, Razak
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (24)
  • [26] Comparison of combustion and pyrolysis for energy generation in a sugarcane mill
    Nsaful, F.
    Goergens, J. F.
    Knoetze, J. H.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 74 : 524 - 534
  • [27] Machine learning for combustion
    Zhou, Lei
    Song, Yuntong
    Ji, Weiqi
    Wei, Haiqiao
    ENERGY AND AI, 2022, 7
  • [28] Thermogravimetric study on the flue-cured tobacco leaf pyrolysis and combustion using a distributed activation energy model
    Wang, Xuebin
    Wang, Zhao
    Dai, Ya
    Ma, Kuoyan
    Zhu, Lijun
    Tan, Houzhang
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 12 (01) : 75 - 84
  • [29] Energy Model Machine (EMM) Instant Building Energy Prediction using Machine Learning
    Asl, Mohammad Rahmani
    Das, Subhajit
    Tsai, Barry
    Molloy, Ian
    Hauck, Anthony
    ECAADE 2017: SHARING OF COMPUTABLE KNOWLEDGE! (SHOCK!), VOL 2, 2017, : 277 - 286
  • [30] Machine Learning Methods for Emissions Prediction in Combustion Engines with Multiple Cylinders
    Hoang Nguyen Khac
    Modabberian, Amin
    Zenger, Kai
    Niskanen, Kalle
    West, Anton
    Zhang, Yejun
    Silvola, Elias
    Lendormy, Eric
    Storm, Xiaoguo
    Mikulski, Maciej
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02): : 3072 - 3078