A comparison of sufentanil and fentanyl for patient-controlled epidural analgesia in arthroplasty

被引:9
作者
Jeon, Hye Rim [1 ]
Chae, Won Seok [1 ]
Lee, Se Jin [1 ]
Lee, Joon Ho [1 ]
Cho, Sung Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Sang Hyun [1 ]
Jin, Hee Cheol [1 ]
Lee, Jeong Seok [1 ]
Kim, Yong Ik [1 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Bucheon, South Korea
关键词
Epidural analgesia; Fentanyl; Ropivacaine; Sufentanil;
D O I
10.4097/kjae.2011.60.1.41
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The use of lipid soluble opioids such as fentanyl, alfentanil and sufentanil are recently on the increase for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). In this study, the effects and adequate dose of sufentanil in arthroplasty were investigated. Methods: Eighty patients scheduled for arthroplasty were enrolled for the study. Seventy-one patients (ASA physical status I-III) were randomly allocated into four groups. All groups received 0.1% ropivacaine through PCEA and each group received either fentanyl (group F: fentanyl 4 mu g/ml) or sufentanil (group S1: sufentanil 0.5 mu g/ml, group S2: sufentanil 0.75 mu g/ml, and group S3: sufentanil 1.0 mu g/ml). Postoperative pain scores were evaluated using VAS (visual analog scale, 0-10) and side effects such as hypotension, nausea/vomiting, pruritus and the degree of satisfaction were evaluated at 1, 6, 12, 24, 48 hours after surgery. Results: Postoperative pain score (VAS) decreased gradually and the highest VAS score was recorded at 1 hour postoperative for all four groups. There were no differences in the degree of satisfaction and postoperative pain score between all groups. The incidence of pruritus was significantly lower in group S1 than in groups S2 and S3. Conclusions: The incidence of side effects were significantly lower in group S1 (0.1% ropivacaine plus sufentanil 0.5 mu g/ml). Therefore, 0.5 mu g/ml of sufentanil through PCEA is the recommended dose for postoperative pain control in arthroplasty.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 46
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Apfel, CC
    Korttila, K
    Abdalla, M
    Kerger, H
    Turan, A
    Vedder, I
    Zernak, C
    Danner, K
    Jokela, R
    Pocock, SJ
    Trenkler, S
    Kredel, M
    Biedler, A
    Sessler, DI
    Roewer, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (24) : 2441 - 2451
  • [2] BADER AM, 1989, ANESTH ANALG, V68, P724
  • [3] Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour
    Capogna, G
    Celleno, D
    Fusco, P
    Lyons, G
    Columb, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (03) : 371 - 373
  • [4] Cho on Kyu, 2007, Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, V53, P746
  • [5] Choi Joo Yeon, 2006, Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, V50, P77
  • [6] Postoperative epidural opioid analgesia: What are the choices?
    deLeonCasasola, OA
    Lema, MJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (04) : 867 - 875
  • [7] EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE/SUFENTANIL THERAPY FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN CONTROL IN PATIENTS TOLERANT TO OPIOID AND UNRESPONSIVE TO EPIDURAL BUPIVACAINE/MORPHINE
    DELEONCASASOLA, OA
    LEMA, MJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 80 (02) : 303 - 309
  • [8] Continuous epidural ropivacaine 0.2% for analgesia after lower abdominal surgery
    Etches, RC
    Writer, WDR
    Ansley, D
    Nydahl, PA
    Ong, BY
    Lui, A
    Badner, N
    Kawolski, S
    Muir, H
    Shukla, R
    Beattie, WS
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (04) : 784 - 790
  • [9] Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures
    Farrar, JT
    Portenoy, RK
    Berlin, JA
    Kinman, JL
    Strom, BL
    [J]. PAIN, 2000, 88 (03) : 287 - 294
  • [10] FENNELLY M, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V72, P449