LEGAL INFORMATION ON THE CURRENT CASE LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION IN RELATION TO THE REFUSAL TO APPLY A PROVISION OF THE NATIONAL LAW, INCONSISTENT WITH THE EU LAW, BY A NATIONAL COURT AND THE LEGAL EFFECTS OF REFERRING A PREJUDICIAL QUESTION TO THE ECJ BY A NATIONAL COURT

被引:0
作者
Jaskowski, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Uniwersytet Kardynala Stefana Wyszynskiego Warsza, Wydzial Prawa & Adm, Warsaw, Poland
来源
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY | 2018年 / 05期
关键词
prejudicial question; primacy of the EU law; refusal to apply an act; suspension of an act; procedural autonomy;
D O I
10.31268/PS.2018.30
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The publication contains a review of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union as regards the refusal to apply a provision of the national law by a national court and the legal effects of referring a prejudicial question to the ECJ by a national court. Firstly, obligations of national organs in case of questioning the conformity of a provision of national law to the EU law are discussed, in view of the doctrine of primacy of the EU law. Secondly, the ECJ case law is presented as regards the application of interim measures by national organs. Thirdly, to a necessary degree the case law related to referring a prejudicial question by a national court is considered, particularly the prerequisites for referring a question and the effects of passing a preliminary ruling.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 196
页数:9
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Arnull A., 2007, EUROPEAN UNION ITS C, P626
  • [2] Dabrowska- Klosinska P., 2010, SKUTKI WYROKOW PREJU, P9
  • [3] Ehricke U., 2018, EUV AEUV VERTRAG EUR, p[2333, 399]
  • [4] Lenaerts K., 2014, EU PROCEDURAL LAW, P244
  • [5] Postulski W., 2010, STOSOWANIE PRAWA UNI, P670
  • [6] Schermersa Wocenie H., 2001, JUDICIAL PROTECTION, P163