Communicating Qualitative Research Study Designs to Research Ethics Review Boards

被引:0
|
作者
Ells, Carolyn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Biomed Eth Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Canada; Institutional Review; Qualitative Research; Research Ethics; and Research Methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Researchers using qualitative methodologies appear to be particularly prone to having their study designs called into question by research ethics or funding agency review committees. In this paper, the author considers the issue of communicating qualitative research study designs in the context of institutional research ethics review and offers suggestions for researchers to consider in their communication of study designs to research ethics review boards. General information about the mandate of research ethics review boards is provided. In light of wide international variability with respect to research ethics regulatory environments and review board processes, specific considerations and suggestions about communicating qualitative study designs effectively are presented within a Canadian case study example.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 891
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPUTER SCIENCE SECURITY RESEARCH AND HUMAN SUBJECTS: EMERGING CONSIDERATIONS FOR RESEARCH ETHICS BOARDS
    Buchanan, Elizabeth
    Aycock, John
    Dexter, Scott
    Dittrich, David
    Hvizdak, Erin
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2011, 6 (02) : 71 - 83
  • [32] Ethics, collective health, qualitative health research and social justice
    Zito Guerriero, Iara Coelho
    Correa, Fernando Penaranda
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2015, 20 (09): : 2631 - 2640
  • [33] Community-Based Participatory Research, Ethics, and Institutional Review Boards: Untying a Gordian Knot
    Cross, Jennifer E.
    Pickering, Kathleen
    Hickey, Matthew
    CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2015, 41 (7-8) : 1007 - 1026
  • [34] An Alternative Ethics? Justice and Care as Guiding Principles for Qualitative Research
    Hammersley, Martyn
    Traianou, Anna
    SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ONLINE, 2014, 19 (03):
  • [35] Behind the scenes of research ethics committee oversight: a qualitative research study with committee chairs in the Middle East and North Africa region
    El Ashkar, Catherine
    Nakkash, Rima
    Matar, Amal
    Makhoul, Jihad
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2024, 25 (01):
  • [36] Effective Practices in the Delivery of Research Ethics Education: A Qualitative Review of Instructional Methods
    Todd, E. Michelle
    Torrence, Brett S.
    Watts, Logan L.
    Mulhearn, Tyler J.
    Connelly, Shane
    Mumford, Michael D.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2017, 24 (05): : 297 - 321
  • [37] The Challenges of Big Data for Research Ethics Committees: A Qualitative Swiss Study
    Ferretti, Agata
    Ienca, Marcello
    Velarde, Minerva Rivas
    Hurst, Samia
    Vayena, Effy
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2022, 17 (1-2) : 129 - 143
  • [38] How Community Pharmacists Perceive Ethics in Clinical Research: A Qualitative Study
    Ogura, Miku
    Takehira, Rieko
    Watanabe, Tatsuya
    Arita, Etsuko
    HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (11)
  • [39] Facilitating research ethics in qualitative research through doctoral supervision in the context of European Commission funding
    Moe, Cathrine
    Uhrenfeldt, Lisbeth
    Kymre, Ingjerd Gare
    RESEARCH ETHICS, 2025, 21 (01) : 16 - 33
  • [40] Embracing qualitative research: a visual model for nuanced research ethics oversight
    Doyle, Elaine
    Buckley, Patrick
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2017, 17 (01) : 95 - 117