VARIATION IN GIVING-UP DENSITIES OF FORAGING CHIPMUNKS (TAMIAS-STRIATUS) AND SQUIRRELS (SCIURUS-CAROLINENSIS)

被引:75
作者
BOWERS, MA [1 ]
JEFFERSON, JL [1 ]
KUEBLER, MG [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV VIRGINIA, BLANDY EXPTL FARM, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA 22903 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3544809
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We measured daily giving up densities (GUDs) of chipmunks and squirrels foraging for sunflower seeds embedded in a sand matrix over a ten week period. Our objective was to account for the variation in GUDs attributable to habitat, species, and rarely measured effects involving time (day sequence), temperature and site-to-site differences in forager densities. Results showed GUDs to be higher for: 1) open sites than under canopy; 2) a chipmunk only treatment than one with chipmunks + squirrels; 3) sites with few than many foragers; and 4) later than earlier periods of the study, particularly for the chipmunk only treatment on hot days. We attribute habitat related differences in GUDs to predation hazard that may be high in the open and lower under tree canopy, and species differences to body size and/or whether foragers were eating seeds directly or caching them. Multivariate analyses of foraging behavior, while not as focused as the more typical one-factor studies, provide an a posteriori means of understanding foraging in much of its complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]   OPTIMAL FORAGING, MARGINAL VALUE THEOREM [J].
CHARNOV, EL .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1976, 9 (02) :129-136
[12]  
CHEVERTON J, 1985, EXPT BEHAVIORAL ECOL
[13]   MICROHABITATS IN A FOREST-FLOOR SMALL MAMMAL FAUNA [J].
DUESER, RD ;
SHUGART, HH .
ECOLOGY, 1978, 59 (01) :89-98
[14]   HABITAT SELECTION UNDER PREDATION HAZARD - TEST OF A MODEL WITH FORAGING MINNOWS [J].
GILLIAM, JF ;
FRASER, DF .
ECOLOGY, 1987, 68 (06) :1856-1862
[15]   THE MARGINAL VALUE THEOREM - A QUANTITATIVE TEST USING LOAD SIZE VARIATION IN A CENTRAL PLACE FORAGER, THE EASTERN CHIPMUNK, TAMIAS-STRIATUS [J].
GIRALDEAU, LA ;
KRAMER, DL .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1982, 30 (NOV) :1036-1042
[16]  
GRAY RD, 1985, FORAGING BEHAVIOR, P69
[17]   SPARROWS AND A BRUSHPILE - FORAGING RESPONSES TO DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF PREDATION RISK AND ENERGY-COST [J].
GRUBB, TC ;
GREENWALD, L .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1982, 30 (AUG) :637-640
[18]   OPTIMAL FORAGING IN BUMBLEBEES - WHY IS NECTAR LEFT BEHIND IN FLOWERS [J].
HODGES, CM ;
WOLF, LL .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1981, 9 (01) :41-44
[19]   THE COMBINED EFFECTS OF PREDATION RISK AND FOOD REWARD ON PATCH SELECTION [J].
HOLBROOK, SJ ;
SCHMITT, RJ .
ECOLOGY, 1988, 69 (01) :125-134
[20]  
Hosmer DW, 1989, APPLIED LOGISTIC REG