Engaging the public with online discussion and spatial annotations: The generation and transformation of public knowledge

被引:13
作者
Bamberg, Jarkko [1 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ, Sch Management, Tampere, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
online discussion; spatial annotations; public participation; knowledge-in-practice; public knowledge; urban planning;
D O I
10.1080/14649357.2012.738306
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Online discussion with spatial annotations has been proposed as a method of facilitating public participation in spatial planning. It has been assumed that it will widen the knowledge base behind decisions by bringing local, first-hand knowledge into planning. However, what type of knowledge will be generated by such a geographically referenced public discussion in the planning process? This article addresses this question by tracing how an online discussion that allowed spatial annotations was implemented in a real-life land-use planning process in Tampere, Finland. The analysis focuses on two distinct phases of knowledge production. First, discussion focuses on how establishing this particular technology as a public forum impacts on the type of knowledge that is provided by the participants. The second part of the study addresses how planners assimilate information from geo-referenced public discussion. The article suggests that the interplay between (1) the site of knowledge production that was at the same time the arena of public discussion, (2) the issues that were deemed necessary to be cared for publicly, and (3) the people who were willing and able to enter the public arena and address issues in the way that the public arena afforded was crucial in shaping the type of knowledge that was generated. Furthermore, the results suggest that the constraints set by the local planning procedures and practical work of planners effectively guide the transformation of this knowledge into the domain of planning. The article starts to unravel contingencies of knowledge production related to public participation methods which use online discussion and spatial annotations.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 56
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STREET SCI COMMUNITY
[2]   Future Natures in the Making: Implementing Biodiversity in Suburban Land-Use Planning [J].
Asikainen, Eveliina ;
Jokinen, Ari .
PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE, 2009, 10 (03) :351-368
[3]   Agonism and institutional ambiguity: Ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice - the case of Finland [J].
Backlund, Pia ;
Mantysalo, Raine .
PLANNING THEORY, 2010, 9 (04) :333-350
[4]   Ambiguities in knowledge production: multimodal analysis of discourse and dramaturgy in public participation GIS experiments [J].
Bamberg, Jarkko .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2010, 37 (05) :895-910
[5]  
Bourdieu P., 1992, LANGUAGE SYMBOLIC PO
[6]  
Bowker G, 1999, SORTING THINGS OUT C
[7]   Gino's lesson on humanity: genetics, mutual entanglements and the sociologist's role [J].
Callon, M ;
Rabeharisoa, V .
ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2004, 33 (01) :1-27
[8]  
Campbell H., 2000, INT PLAN STUD, V5, P321, DOI [DOI 10.1080/713672862, 10.1080/713672862]
[9]   Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems [J].
Carver, S ;
Evans, A ;
Kingston, R ;
Turton, I .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2001, 28 (06) :907-921
[10]   Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making - Improving urban planning for communities at risk [J].
Corburn, J .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2003, 22 (04) :420-433