Correcting Internal Consistency Estimates Inflated by Correlated Item Errors

被引:10
作者
Pascual-Ferra, Paola [1 ]
Beatty, Michael J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ Maryland, Dept Commun, 4501 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21210 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Dept Commun Studies, Coral Gables, FL 33416 USA
关键词
Coefficient Alpha; Congenericity; Correlated Item Errors; Measurement Error; Reliability;
D O I
10.1080/08824096.2015.1089858
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Coefficient alpha is perhaps the most widely employed estimate of reliability for self-report measures in communication research. However, coefficient alpha misestimates internal consistency when measures are not congeneric. Congeneric measures meet the assumption of classical test theory in that all item errors are uncorrelated or random; when item errors are correlated, the measure fails to be congeneric, signaling the presence of latent factor(s) other than those the researcher intended to measure. Scholars have alerted to the fact that many self-report measures used are noncongeneric and that coefficient alpha might be yielding inaccurate, often inflated, reliability estimates. In this essay, we propose a formula for estimating the internal consistency of a measure that reflects the degree to which reliability is affected by correlated item errors.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 352
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Two Studies Examining the Error Theory Underlying the Measurement Model of the Verbal Aggressiveness Scale [J].
Beatty, Michael J. ;
Pascual-Ferra, Paola ;
Levine, Timothy R. .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (01) :55-81
[2]   DOES ITEM HOMOGENEITY INDICATE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OR ITEM REDUNDANCY IN PSYCHOMETRIC SCALES [J].
BOYLE, GJ .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1991, 12 (03) :291-294
[3]  
Brown TA, 2006, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
[4]   EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON OF COEFFICIENT ALPHA, GUTTMAN LAMBDA - 2, AND MSPLIT MAXIMIZED SPLIT-HALF RELIABILITY ESTIMATES [J].
CALLENDER, JC ;
OSBURN, HG .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1979, 16 (02) :89-99
[5]   The correction for attenuation due to measurement error: Clarifying concepts and creating confidence sets [J].
Charles, EP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2005, 10 (02) :206-226
[6]   Two approaches for correcting correlation attenuation caused by measurement error: Implications for research practice [J].
Fan, XT .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 63 (06) :915-930
[7]   STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF SETS OF CONGENERIC TESTS [J].
JORESKOG, KG .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1971, 36 (02) :109-&
[8]  
Kline R. B., 2011, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470013192.BSA655
[9]  
Marsh H. W., 1995, STRUCTURAL EQUATION, P177
[10]   CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSES OF MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD DATA - A COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE MODELS [J].
MARSH, HW ;
BAILEY, M .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1991, 15 (01) :47-70