Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension

被引:0
|
作者
Belghazi, Jalil [1 ]
El Feghali, Ramzi N. [1 ]
Moussalem, Therese [1 ]
Rejdych, Maya [1 ]
Asmar, Roland G. [1 ]
机构
[1] CardioVasc Inst, 2 Rue Docteur Blanche, F-75016 Paris, France
关键词
Omron M1 Plus (HEM-4011C-E); Omron M6 Comfort (HEM-7000-E); Spengler KP7500 D and Microlife BP A100 Plus; validation; International Protocol; self-blood pressure measurement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: Four electronic devices for self-measurement of brachial blood pressure (BP): the Omron M1 Plus, the Omron M6 Comfort, the Spengler KP7500 D, and the Microlife BP A100 Plus, were evaluated in four separate studies according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH). Design: The International Validation Protocol is divided into 2 phases: the first phase is performed on 15 selected subjects (45 pairs of BP measurements); if the device passes this phase, 18 supplementary subjects are included (54 pairs of BP measurements) making a total number of 33 subjects (99 pairs of BP measurements) on which the final validation is performed. Methods: The same methodology recommended by the ESH protocol was applied for the 4 studies. In each study and for each subject, 4 BP measurements were performed simultaneously by 2 trained observers using mercury sphygmomanometers alternately with 3 measurements by the tested device. The difference between the BP value given by the device and that obtained by the two observers (mean of the two observers) was calculated for each measure. The 99 pairs of BP differences were classified into 3 categories (<= 5, <= 10, <= 15 mmHg). The number of differences in each category was compared with the number required by the International Protocol. An individual analysis was then done to determine for each subject the number of comparisons <= 5 mmHg. At least 22 of the 33 subjects should have 2 of their 3 comparisons = 5 mmHg. Results: All 4 tested devices passed the first and the second phase of the validation process. The average differences between the device and mercury sphygmomanometer readings were -1.4 +/- 5.5 and -0.4 +/- 4.8 mmHg for SBP and DBP respectively for the Omron M1 Plus device, -2.1 +/- 7.4 and 0.1 +/- 4.9 mmHg for SBP and DBP respectively for the Omron M6 Comfort device, -1.4 +/- 8.6 and -0.1 +/- 3.5 mmHg for SBP and DBP respectively for the Spengler KP7500 D device, and 1.6 +/- 4.2 mmHg and 0.54 +/- 2.8 mmHg for SBP and DBP respectively for the Microlife BP A100 Plus device. For all devices, readings differing by less than 5, 10, and 15 mmHg for SBP and DBP values fulfill the recommendation criteria of the International Protocol as well as the individual analysis. Conclusions: Omron M1 Plus (HEM-4011C-E), Omron M6 Comfort (HEM 7000-E), Spengler KP7500 D, and Microlife BP A100 Plus devices fulfilled the validation recommendations of the International Protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 400
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of four automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol of the European Society of Hypertension
    Topouchian, Jirar
    Agnoletti, Davide
    Blacher, Jacques
    Youssef, Ahmed
    Ibanez, Isabel
    Khabouth, Jose
    Khawaja, Salwa
    Beaino, Layale
    Asmar, Roland
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2011, 7 : 709 - 717
  • [2] VALIDATION OF THREE AUTOMATIC BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS FOR SELF-MEASUREMENT ACCORDING TO EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION INTERNATIONAL PROTOCOL REVERSION 2010
    Tian, H.
    Zeng, S. Y.
    Zhong, Z. Y.
    Gong, W.
    Liu, W. J.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2015, 33 : E155 - E155
  • [3] VALIDATION OF THE WRIST AUTOMATIC DEVICE FOR SELF-MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE - THE TRAVEL CHECK - ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION PROTOCOL
    Germano, G.
    Pecchioli, V.
    Psimenos, A.
    Sarullo, F.
    Venditti, A.
    Asmar, R.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2009, 27 : S352 - S352
  • [4] VALIDATION OF THREE AUTOMATIC DEVICES FOR SELF-MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HYPERTENSION PROTOCOL: THE PERSONAL CHECK, THE COMFORT CHECK AND THE MY CHECK
    Germano, G.
    Pecchioli, V.
    Psimenos, A.
    Sarullo, F.
    Venditti, A.
    Sakis, R.
    Asmar, R.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2009, 27 : S352 - S352
  • [5] Self-measurement of blood pressure: validation of the Braun BP VitalScan Plus 1650 monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol
    Nolly, Hector
    Osso, Pablo
    Nolly, Alejandro
    Silva, Martin
    Nolly, Mariela
    Romero, Marcelo
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2008, 13 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [6] Validation of the HEM-780REL with easy wrap cuff for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol
    Viera, Anthony J.
    Hinderliter, Alan L.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2007, 12 (05) : 335 - 338
  • [7] Validation of Transtek blood pressure monitor TMB-1491 for self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Tian, Huiyong
    Zeng, Sijian
    Zhong, Xiaoyan
    Gong, Wei
    Liu, Wenjun
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2015, 20 (05) : 280 - 282
  • [8] Validation of the iHealth BP7 wrist blood pressure monitor, for self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Wang, Qing
    Zhao, Huadong
    Chen, Wan
    Li, Ni
    Wan, Yi
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2014, 19 (01) : 54 - 57
  • [9] Validation of the Medisana MTP Plus upper arm blood pressure monitor, for self-measurement, according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Erdem, Emre
    Aydogdu, Turkan
    Akpolat, Tekin
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2011, 16 (01) : 43 - 46
  • [10] Validation of the Globalcare GCE603 automated blood pressure monitor for self-measurement according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010
    Song, Cheng
    Yu, Yang
    Lu, Bao-Chuan
    Yan, Xi-Ling
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2020, 25 (05) : 291 - 294