On the Problem of Will and Self-Regulation in Cultural-Historical Psychology

被引:15
作者
Smirnova, E. O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Moscow State Univ Psychol & Educ, Ctr Psychol & Pedag Expertise Games & Toys, Moscow, Russia
来源
KULTURNO-ISTORICHESKAYA PSIKHOLOGIYA-CULTURAL-HISTORICAL PSYCHOLOGY | 2015年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
will; self-regulation; awareness; mediation; motivation; activity; interpsychic form;
D O I
10.17759/chp.2015110302
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper attempts to differentiate between the concepts of 'will' and 'self-regulation'. Basing on literature research the author presumes that here we deal with two qualitatively different and specific processes: one of them centers around the awareness of an individual's actions, while at the core of the other lies the impulse to act, i.e. motivation. Thus the author sets forth a hypothesis that will and self-regulation have very different psychological content and different lines of development in ontogenesis. Following L.S. Vygotsky, the author considers self-regulation as the ability to control oneself (one's inner and outer activity) with the help of culturally provided means of organizing behavior. Stages of self-regulation development are therefore shaped by the level of the individual's awareness of his/her activity and by the means employed for its organization. Will, as it has been interpreted over the course of history, is considered as the urge towards active actions, as the powerfulness and persistence of one's wishes and desires (volitions). From this perspective the development of will way be described as the formation of persistent motivation in a child, as the emergence of his/her own desires. The paper reveals the relationship between impulse and awareness in various forms of child activities suggesting that, however specific, will and self-regulation are one in their genesis. The final part discusses issues in modern childhood related to the development of will and self-regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Bozhovich L. I, 1968, LICHNOST EE FORMIROV
  • [2] Elkonin B.D., 2010, OPOSREDSTVOVANIE DEI
  • [3] Elkonin D.B., 2006, DETSKAYA PSIKHOLOGIY
  • [4] Ivannikov V.A., 1985, PSIKHOL ZH, P47
  • [5] Leontev A.N., 1975, DEYATELNOST SOZNANIE
  • [6] Rubinshtein S. L, 2002, OSNOVY OBSHCHEI PSIK
  • [7] Vygotskii L.S., 1984, SOBRANIE SOCHINENII, V6
  • [8] Vygotskii L. S., 1983, SOBRANIE SOCHINENII, V6
  • [9] Zaporozhets A.V., 1986, IZBRANNYE PSIKHOLOGI, V2
  • [10] Zeigarnik B.V., 1981, TEORIYA LICHNOSTI LE