Biomechanical evaluation of DTRAX (R) posterior cervical cage stabilization with and without lateral mass fixation

被引:17
作者
Voronov, Leonard I. [1 ,2 ]
Siemionow, Krzysztof B. [3 ]
Havey, Robert M. [1 ,2 ]
Carandang, Gerard [2 ]
Patwardhan, Avinash G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ Chicago, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Maywood, IL USA
[2] Edward Hines Jr VA Hosp, Musculoskeletal Biomech Lab, 5000 South 5th Ave, Hines, IL 60141 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Coll Med Chicago, Dept Orthopaed, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
cervical spine; posterior fusion; biomechanics; cervical facets; DTRAX cervical cage; lateral mass screw;
D O I
10.2147/MDER.S111031
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Introduction: Lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation with plates or rods is the current standard procedure for posterior cervical fusion. Recently, implants placed between the facet joints have become available as an alternative to LMS or transfacet screws for patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of the DTRAX (R) cervical cage for single- and two-level fusion and compare this to the stability achieved with LMS fixation with rods in a two-level construct. Methods: Six cadaveric cervical spine (C3-C7) specimens were tested in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation to +/- 1.5 Nm moment without preload (0 N) in the following conditions: 1) intact (C3-C7), 2) LMS and rods at C4-C5 and C5-C6, 3) removal of all rods (LMS retained) and placement of bilateral posterior cages at C5-C6, 4) bilateral posterior cages at C4-C5 and C5-C6 (without LMS and rods), and 5) C4-C5 and C5-C6 bilateral posterior cages at C4-C5 and C5-C6 with rods reinserted. Results: Bilateral posterior cervical cages significantly reduced range of motion in all tested directions in both single-and multilevel constructs (P<0.05). Similar stability was achieved with bilateral posterior cages and LMS in a two-level construct: 0.6 degrees +/- 0.3 degrees vs 1.2 degrees +/- 0.4 degrees in flexion-extension (P=0.001), (5.0 degrees +/- 2.6 degrees vs 3.1 degrees +/- 1.3 degrees) in lateral bending (P=0.053), (1.3 degrees +/- 1.0 degrees vs 2.2 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees) in axial rotation (P=0.091) for posterior cages and LMS, respectively. Posterior cages, when placed as an adjunct to LMS, further reduced range of motion in a multilevel construct (P<0.05). Conclusion: Bilateral posterior cages provide similar cervical segmental stability compared with a LMS and rod construct and may be an alternative surgical option for select patients. Furthermore, supplementation of a lateral mass construct with posterior cages increases cervical spine stability in single- and multilevel conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 290
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Neck muscle vibration can improve sensorimotor function in patients with neck pain [J].
Beinert, Konstantin ;
Keller, Martin ;
Taube, Wolfgang .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (03) :514-521
[2]   Co-contraction of cervical muscles during sagittal and coronal neck motions at different movement speeds [J].
Cheng, Chih-Hsiu ;
Lin, Kwan-Hwa ;
Wang, Jaw-Lin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 103 (06) :647-654
[3]   Altered Co-contraction of Cervical Muscles in Young Adults with Chronic Neck Pain during Voluntary Neck Motions [J].
Cheng, Chih-Hsiu ;
Cheng, Hsin-Yi Kathy ;
Chen, Carl Pai-Chu ;
Lin, Kwan-Hwa ;
Liu, Wen-Yu ;
Wang, Shwu-Fen ;
Hsu, Wei-Li ;
Chuang, Yu-Fen .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2014, 26 (04) :587-590
[4]   Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in the Cervical Spine A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Coe, Jeffrey D. ;
Vaccaro, Alexander R. ;
Dailey, Andrew T. ;
Skolasky, Richard L., Jr. ;
Sasso, Richard C. ;
Ludwig, Steven C. ;
Brodt, Erika D. ;
Dettori, Joseph R. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (23) :2136-2143
[5]   Clinimetric evaluation of methods to measure muscle functioning in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review [J].
de Koning, Chantal H. P. ;
van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. ;
Staal, J. Bart ;
Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. ;
Hendriks, Erik J. M. .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2008, 9 (1)
[6]   Facetal distraction as treatment for single- and multilevel cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: a preliminary report Technical note [J].
Goel, Atul ;
Shah, Abhidha .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 14 (06) :689-696
[7]   COMPLICATIONS OF POSTERIOR CERVICAL PLATING [J].
HELLER, JG ;
SILCOX, DH ;
SUTTERLIN, CE .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (22) :2442-2448
[8]   Biomechanical Evaluation of an Interfacet Joint Decompression and Stabilization System [J].
Leasure, Jeremi M. ;
Buckley, Jenni .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (07)
[9]   Cortical bone facet spacers for cervical spine decompression: effects on intervertebral kinetics and foraminal area [J].
Maulucci, Christopher M. ;
Sansur, Charles A. ;
Singh, Vaneet ;
Cholewczynski, Alexandra ;
Shetye, Snehal S. ;
McGilvray, Kirk ;
Puttlitz, Christian M. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (01) :69-76
[10]  
McAllister Beck D, 2012, Surg Neurol Int, V3, pS225, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.98581