The Effects of Laser and Ultrasound Therapy on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

被引:0
作者
Saeed, Fazal-Ur-Rehman [1 ]
Hanif, Saquib [2 ]
Aasim, Muhammad [3 ]
机构
[1] CMH Quetta, Phys Med & Rehabil, Quetta, Pakistan
[2] Armed Forces Inst Rehabil Med Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
[3] Sh Zayed Hosp, NHRC, Lahore, Pakistan
来源
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES | 2012年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Ultrasound Therapy; Low Level Laser Therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compressive neuropathy of upper limb and one of the causes of disability. The conservative management of CTS includes splints, intracarpal steroids and ultrasound therapy. Recently Low- energy Laser Therapy has been popularized in the treatment various treatment including carpal tunnel syndrome. We compared the effects of both of these therapies in a randomized trial. Objectives: To compare the effects of laser versus ultrasound therapy on carpal tunnel syndrome Methods: A total of hundred patients of unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed clinically and electrophysiologically were included in the study and divided in two equal groups. One group was treated by UltrasoundTtherapy (1MHz, 1.0 Watt/cm(2)) and the other group by Low Level Laser Therapy (830 nm infrared). Patients were blinded to the two types of treatment. Treatment Outcome was measured subjectively by Visual analogue scale, functional status scale and Symptom Severity Scale for gravity of symptoms. Objectively outcome was measured electrophysiologically before and after the treatment. Results: Improvement was more marked in ultrasound treated group than laser treated group. Pain relief on Visual Analogue Scale, Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale was 2.30 points, 0.44 and 0.34 points more in Ultrasound treated group as compared to Laser treated group. Electrophysiologically improvement in Sensory Latency and Motor Latency was 0.46 ms and 0.62 ms more in ultrasound treated group. P value was less than 0.001 Conclusion: Ultrasound treatment proved to be more effective than Laser treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population
    Atroshi, I
    Gummesson, C
    Johnssson, R
    Ornstein, E
    Ranstam, J
    Rosén, I
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (02): : 153 - 158
  • [2] Aydin K, 2007, TURK NEUROSURG, V17, P219
  • [3] Badarny S, 2011, ISR MED ASSOC J, V13, P25
  • [4] Ultrasound and laser therapy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome
    Bakhtiary, AH
    Rashidy-Pour, A
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2004, 50 (03): : 147 - 151
  • [5] EFFECTS OF 830 NM CONTINUOUS-WAVE LASER-DIODE IRRADIATION ON MEDIAN NERVE FUNCTION IN NORMAL SUBJECTS
    BASFORD, JR
    HALLMAN, HO
    MATSUMOTO, JY
    MOYER, SK
    BUSS, JM
    BAXTER, GD
    [J]. LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 1993, 13 (06) : 597 - 604
  • [6] EFFECTS OF LOW-INTENSITY INFRARED-LASER IRRADIATION UPON CONDUCTION IN THE HUMAN MEDIAN NERVE IN-VIVO
    BAXTER, GD
    WALSH, DM
    ALLEN, JM
    LOWE, AS
    BELL, AJ
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 79 (02) : 227 - 234
  • [7] Croft P., 1993, EPIDEMIOLOGY RHEUMAT, P399
  • [8] CARPAL-TUNNEL SYNDROME - PREVALENCE IN THE GENERAL-POPULATION
    DEKROM, MCTFM
    KNIPSCHILD, PG
    KESTER, ADM
    THIJS, CT
    BOEKKOOI, PF
    SPAANS, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (04) : 373 - 376
  • [9] The Effectiveness of Conservative Treatments of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Splinting, Ultrasound, and Low-Level Laser Therapies
    Dincer, Umit
    Cakar, Engin
    Kiralp, Mehmet Zeki
    Kilac, Hilmi
    Dursun, Hasan
    [J]. PHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERY, 2009, 27 (01) : 119 - 125
  • [10] Ultrasound treatment for treating the carpal tunnel syndrome: randomised "sham" controlled trial
    Ebenbichler, GR
    Resch, KL
    Nicolakis, P
    Wiesinger, GF
    Uhl, F
    Ghanem, AH
    Fialka, V
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7133) : 731 - 735