MITICIDE BIOASSAYS WITH SPIDER-MITES (ACARI, TETRANYCHIDAE) - EFFECT OF TEST METHOD, EXPOSURE PERIOD AND MORTALITY CRITERION ON THE PRECISION OF RESPONSE ESTIMATES

被引:18
作者
KABIR, KH
CHAPMAN, RB
PENMAN, DR
机构
[1] Department of Entomology, Lincoln University
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00058509
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Six different bioassay methods were evaluated using propargite (Omite 30% wettable powder (WP) and fenbutatin oxide (Torque 50% (WP) and 55% suspension concentrate (SC)) with twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch (TSM) and European red mite, Panonychus ulmi Koch (ERM) to document their utility and precision for estimating median lethal concentrations (LC). For each method, two post-treatment exposure periods and mortality criteria were used. Post-treatment exposure period and mortality criterion had a significant influence on the precision of LC50 estimates for all tested miticides with all bioassays methods. Twenty four hour (h) post-treatment exposure was found to be the most suitable for the slide dip and Petri dish methods while 48h was the most appropriate for leaf disc methods. Scoring moribund mites as dead was the most satisfactory criterion for ensuring that biossays were as simple and precise as possible. The Petri dish residue-Potter tower method (PDR-PT) estimated the responses of TSM and EPM to propargite with high precision. The same method was not as precise for fenbutatin oxide formulations. Because significant mite run-off occurred with the leaf disc methods, their precision was not fully established. The slide dip method gave less precise estimates of LC50 values for propargite (WP) and fenbutatin oxide (WP), while the same method gave more precise LC50 estimates for fenbutatin oxide (SC) than the PDR-PT method. The toxicity of candidate miticides was found to be method-and species-dependent.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 708
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Brewer M.J., Trumble J.T., Classifying resistance severity in field populations: Sampling inspection plans for an insecticide resistance monitoring program, Journal of Economic Entomology, 84, pp. 379-389, (1991)
[2]  
Dennehy T.J., Grafton-Cardwell E.E., Granett J., Barbour K., Practitioner-assessable bioassay for detection of dicofol resistance in spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae), Journal of Economic Entomology, 80, pp. 998-1003, (1987)
[3]  
Dennchy T.J., Granett J., Leigh T.F., Relevance of slide-dip and residual bioassay comparison to detection of resistance in spider mites, Journal of Economic Entomology, 76, pp. 1225-1230, (1983)
[4]  
Finney D.J., Probit analysis, (1977)
[5]  
Helle W., Overmeer W.P.J., Toxicological test methods, Spider mites, their biology, natural enemies and control, pp. 3991-3995, (1985)
[6]  
Hoskins W.M., Craig R., Uses of bioassay in entomology, Annual Review of Entomology, 7, pp. 437-463, (1962)
[7]  
Keena M.A., Granett J., Variability in toxicity of propargite to spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) from California almonds, Journal of Economic Entomology, 78, pp. 1212-1216, (1985)
[8]  
Knowles C.O., Errampalli D.D., El-Sayed G.N., Comparative toxicities of selected pesticides to bulb mite (Acari: Acaridae) and twospotted mite (Acari: Tetranychidae), Journal of Economic Entomology, 81, pp. 1586-1591, (1988)
[9]  
Potter C., An improved laboratory apparatus for applying direct sprays and surface films, with data on the electrostatic charge on atomized spray fluids, Annals of Applied Biology, 39, pp. 1-29, (1952)
[10]  
Pree D.J., Cole K.J., Fisher P.A., Comparison of leaf disc and petri dish assays for the assessment of dicofol resistance in populations of European red mite from southern Ontario, The Canadian Entomologist, 121, pp. 771-776, (1989)