BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL STABILIZATION SYSTEMS - AN ASSESSMENT OF TRANSPEDICULAR SCREW FIXATION IN THE CERVICAL-SPINE

被引:251
作者
KOTANI, Y
CUNNINGHAM, BW
ABUMI, K
MCAFEE, PC
机构
[1] Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, The Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD
[2] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Scoliosis and Spine Center, Sapporo
关键词
CERVICAL SPINE; SPINAL INSTRUMENTATION; BIOMECHANICS;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199411001-00007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. The biomechanical stability of seven cervical reconstruction methods including the transpedicular screw fixation was evaluated under four instability patterns. These four modalities, based on the range and grade of instability, allowed a reproducible biomechanical assessment to establish the in vitro role of internal fixation in the cervical spine. Objectives. This study biomechanically investigated the stability of seven reconstruction methods in the cervical spine as influenced by four instability patterns and assessed whether three-column fixation for the cervical spine using transpedicular screw fixation would provide increased stability over that of conventional cervical fixation systems. Methods. A total of 24 calf cervical spine specimens were divided into four experimental groups. The spinal constructs including seven reconstruction techniques-the posterior AO titanium reconstruction plate, Bohlman's posterior triple-wiring, transpedicular screw fixation, anterior iliac bone graft, anterior AcroMed plate, anterior AO titanium locking plate, and combined fixation with the AO anterior plate and posterior triple-wiring-were tested under four loading modes. Results. Anterior plating methods provided less stability than that of posterior constructs under axial, torsional, and flexural loading conditions. Exclusive posterior procedures provided increased stability compared with the intact spine in one level fixation, however, did not sustain the torsional stability when the anterior and middle column was eliminated in two-level fixation. The stabilizing capabilities of both the combined fixation and transpedicular screw fixation were clearly demonstrated in all loading modes, however, those of the latter were superior in multilevel fixation. Conclusion. Front and back approaches, employing the anterior plate and posterior triple-wiring, and transpedicular screw fixation demonstrated clear biomechanical advantages when the extent of instability increased to three-column or multilevel. Three-column fixation for the cervical spine using transpedicular screw fixation offers increased stability over that of conventional cervical fixation systems, particularly in multiple level constructs.
引用
收藏
页码:2529 / 2539
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Abumi K., Itoh H., Taneichi H., Kaneda K., Transpedicular screw fixation for traumatic lesions of the middle and lower cervical spine: Description of the techniques and preliminary report, J Spinal Dis, 7, pp. 19-28, (1994)
  • [2] Aebi M., Zuber K., Marchesi D., Treatment of cervical spine injuries with anterior plating: Indications, techniques, and results, Spine, 16, (1991)
  • [3] Allen B.L., Ferguson R.L., Lehmann T.R., O'Brien R.P., A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine, Spine, 7, pp. 1-27, (1982)
  • [4] Anderson P.A., Henley M.B., Grady M.S., Montesano P.X., Winn H.R., Posterior cervical arthrodesis with AO reconstruction plates and bone graft, Spine, 16, (1991)
  • [5] Bohlman H.H., Erson P.A., Anterior Decompression and arthrodesis of the cervical spine: Long-term motor improvement. Part I-Improvement in incomplete traumatic quadri-paresis, J Bone Joint Surg, 74A, pp. 671-681, (1992)
  • [6] Bohlman H.H., Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine: An analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literature, J Bone Joint Surg, 61A, pp. 1119-1142, (1979)
  • [7] Cloward R.B., The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks, J Neurosurg, 15, pp. 602-614, (1958)
  • [8] Cloward R.B., Treatment of acute fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine by vertebral-body fusion: A report of eleven cases, J Neurosurgery, 18, pp. 201-209, (1961)
  • [9] Coe J.D., Warden K.E., Sutterlin C.E., McAfee P.C., Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spinal stabilization methods in a human cadaveric model, Spine, 14, pp. 1122-1131, (1989)
  • [10] Cotterill P.C., Kostuik J.P., D'Angelo G., Maki B.E., The anatomical comparison of the human and bovine spine, J Orthop Res, 4, pp. 298-303, (1986)