TECHNIQUES FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION ECHO-PLANAR MR IMAGING OF THE PANCREAS

被引:24
作者
REIMER, P
SAINI, S
HAHN, PF
MUELLER, PR
BRADY, TJ
COHEN, MS
机构
[1] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP, CTR MGH NMR, 32 FRUIT ST, BOSTON, MA 02114 USA
[2] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP, DEPT RADIOL, DIV GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOL, BOSTON, MA 02114 USA
[3] HARVARD UNIV, SCH MED, BOSTON, MA 02114 USA
关键词
MAGNETIC RESONANCE (MR); CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; ECHO PLANAR; PULSE SEQUENCES; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION; PANCREAS; MR; NEOPLASMS; PANCREATITIS;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.182.1.1727278
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Recent technical advances in echo-planar magnetic resonance (MR) imaging prompted an investigation of these new techniques in pancreatic MR imaging and evaluation of bowel lumen enhancement with an aqueous bowel contrast agent. In 42 subjects (36 healthy, six with pancreatic disease), various T1-weighted inversion-recovery and T2-weighted spin-echo fat-suppressed pulse sequences were assessed with an echo-planar technique implemented with a modified clinical MR imager. Single-excitation imaging (echo time, 26 msec) provided a higher (P < .05) signal-to-noise ratio than did conventional spin-echo and all other echo-planar techniques. In 13 (72%) of 18 healthy subjects who did not undergo administration of the contrast agent, the entire pancreas was distinguished from adjoining bowel. In all 18 subjects who underwent contrast-enhanced imaging, a significantly greater (P < .05) intraluminal signal intensity was apparent with all echo-planar pulse sequences and the entire pancreas was identified. In six patients with pancreatic disease, lesions could be identified by their difference in signal intensity.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 179
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MR imaging of the liver: Comparison between single-shot echo-planar and half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences
    Yamashita, Y
    Tang, Y
    Namimoto, T
    Mitsuzaki, K
    Takahashi, M
    RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (02) : 331 - 337
  • [32] Hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke: Diagnosis with diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted echo-planar MR imaging
    Ebisu, T
    Tanaka, C
    Umeda, M
    Kitamura, M
    Fukunaga, M
    Aoki, I
    Sato, H
    Higuchi, T
    Naruse, S
    Horikawa, Y
    Ueda, S
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (03) : 823 - 828
  • [33] Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: Experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and correlation with tumor angiogenesis
    Hulka, CA
    Edmister, WB
    Smith, BL
    Tan, LJ
    Sgroi, DC
    Campbell, T
    Kopans, DB
    Weisskoff, RM
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (03) : 837 - 842
  • [34] High resolution diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas using reduced field of view single-shot echo-planar imaging at 3 T
    Ma, Chao
    Li, Yan-jun
    Pan, Chun-shu
    Wang, He
    Wang, Jian
    Chen, Shi-yue
    Lu, Jian-ping
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (02) : 125 - 131
  • [35] Clinical and radiological patterns of human stroke as defined by echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging
    Lövblad, KO
    Weber, J
    Heid, O
    Mattle, HP
    Schroth, G
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 1998, 11 : 227 - 230
  • [36] LIMITS TO NEURAL STIMULATION IN ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING
    MANSFIELD, P
    HARVEY, PR
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 29 (06) : 746 - 758
  • [37] Motion robust GRAPPA for echo-planar imaging
    Baron, Corey A.
    Beaulieu, Christian
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2016, 75 (03) : 1166 - 1174
  • [38] BENIGN AND MALIGNANT BREAST-LESIONS - DIFFERENTIATION WITH ECHO-PLANAR MR-IMAGING
    HULKA, CA
    SMITH, BL
    SGROI, DC
    TAN, LJ
    EDMISTER, WB
    SEMPLE, JP
    CAMPBELL, T
    KOPANS, DB
    BRADY, TJ
    WEISSKOFF, RM
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [39] ANALYSIS OF FLOW EFFECTS IN ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING
    BUTTS, K
    RIEDERER, SJ
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1992, 2 (03): : 285 - 293
  • [40] DUAL-ECHO INTERLEAVED ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING OF THE BRAIN
    SLAVIN, GS
    BUTTS, K
    RYDBERG, JN
    JACK, CR
    RIEDERER, SJ
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1995, 33 (02) : 264 - 270