EFFECTS OF 5-FLUOROURACIL, LEUCOVORIN, AND GLUCARATE IN RAT COLON-TUMOR EXPLANTS

In a previous study, we showed that 5-fluorouracil (FU) is active against the dimethylhydrazine-induced colon tumor in rats; a 7-day infusion of FU at 30 mg/kg daily produced 85% tumor-free cures. The present study examined the effects of FU alone and in combination with leucovorin (LV) or D-glucarate (GT) using an ex vivo system that maintained the growth of the rat colon-tumor explants on collagen gels. The labeling index (LI) was determined by the incorporation of [H-3]-thymidine and autoradiography. The mean LI of the untreated control was 64.8% +/- 19.8%. The IC50, IC90, and IC95 values following a 7-day exposure to FU were 0.36, 0.75, and 1.22-mu-M, respectively. In comparison, the steady-state FU concentration required to produce 67% tumor-free cures in rats following a 7-day infusion is 1.54-mu-M. LV alone did not produce any antiproliferative effect at concentrations as high as 10-mu-M. The addition of LV at concentrations of 0.001 - 10-mu-M did not significantly reduce the IC50 of FU. The lack of effect of LV may have been due to tissue saturation with folate provided in the culture medium. GT alone reduced the tumor LI by 20%-30% at concentrations of 0.1 - 10-mu-M. GT enhanced the effect of FU. As compared with FU alone, the addition of GT at concentrations of 0.1 and 1.0-mu-M reduced the IC50 of FU by 47% and 60% to 0.21 and 0.16-mu-M, respectively. Assessment of the potentiation of the inhibitory effect of FU by GT using two-way analysis of variance and the isobologram method indicated a significant synergistic interaction between FU and GT. This interaction occurred within the FU concentration range of 0.08 and 0.4-mu-M. In summary, these data indicate that (a) the IC values for FU are comparable in tumor explants and in rats, suggesting that the effects in cultured tumors reflect those in intact animals; (b) GT alone showed antitumor activity, albeit relatively minor as compared with FU; (c) FU and GT exhibited synergistic activity, which was most pronounced at FU concentrations that produced submaximal activity (< 30% inhibition of tumor LI); and (d) GT and LV had different effects On the growth inhibition by FU, suggesting that GT acts by a mechanism different from the thymidylate synthase-directed effect of FU and LV.