Clinical composite measures of disease activity and damage used to evaluate patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic literature review

被引:8
作者
Castrejon, Isabel [1 ]
Rua-Figueroa, Inigo [2 ]
Piedad Rosario, Maria [3 ]
Carmona, Loreto [4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Hosp Joint Dis, Sch Med, Dept Med,Div Reumatol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Hosp Dr Negrin, Dept Reumatol, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
[3] Soc Espanola Reumatol, Unidad Invest, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Camilo Jose Cela, Inst Salud Musculoesquelet, Madrid, Spain
来源
REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA | 2014年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
Validation; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Disease activity; Damage; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1016/j.reuma.2014.01.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the most appropriate indices to evaluate the disease activity and damage in patients with sytemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify validation studies of indices used to evaluate disease activity and damage. We collected information for each instrument on every aspect of validation including feasibility, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change using ad hoc forms. Results: A total of 38 articles were included addressing the validation of 6 composite indices to evaluate disease activity (BILAG, ECLAM, SLAM, SLEDAI, LAI and SLAQ); and 3 indices to evaluate damage (SLICC/ACE-DI, LDIQand BILD). Only the SLAQ, LIDIQand the BILD were self-administered. Feasibility and internal consistency was only studied in 3 indices (BILAG, SLAQ and SDI) with a Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.35 to 0.87. The intra-observer reliability was examined by the intraclass correlation coefficient for BILAG with a result of 0.48 (95%CI: 0,23-0,81) and using analysis of variance for SLAM-R (0,78), SLEDAI (0,33) and the LAI (0,81). The inter-observer feasibility was evaluated using the correlation coefficient for ECLAM (0,90-0,93), the SLAM (0,86) and MEX-SLEDAI (0,97-0,89). The construct validity was examined by means of convergence with other instruments, specifically with global assessment by the physician, with similar results between indices (0,48-0,75). Lastly, responsiveness was tested in all indices except LAI, SDI and LDIQ, with a standardized response mean ranging from 0.12 to 0.75. Conclusions: Although multiple instruments have been validated for use in SLE it was not possible to find direct evidence of which is the most appropriate. BILAG and SLEDAI, with moderate feasibility and low responsiveness, are the 2 indices with a most complete validation and more extensively used 2013 Elsevier Espafia, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 320
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical significance of platelet-lymphocyte ratio in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Relation to disease activity and damage
    El-Said, Nora Y.
    El Adle, Suzan
    Fathi, Hanan M.
    EGYPTIAN RHEUMATOLOGIST, 2022, 44 (03) : 225 - 229
  • [32] Clinical utility of selected disease activity markers in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
    Horák, P
    Scudla, V
    Hermanová, Z
    Pospísil, Z
    Faltynek, L
    Budíkovà, M
    Kusà, L
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2001, 20 (05) : 337 - 344
  • [33] Association of calreticulin expression with disease activity and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus patients
    Wang, Yichao
    Xie, Jiaogui
    Liu, Zhili
    Fu, Hongwei
    Huo, Qianyu
    Gu, Yajun
    Liu, Yunde
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2017, 13 (05) : 2577 - 2583
  • [34] Association of the Spectrum of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus with Disease Activity and Systemic Manifestations in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    Brahmanti, Herwinda
    Wahono, Cesarius Singgih
    Pratama, Mirza Zaka
    Rahman, Perdana Aditya
    Suhendra, Riski Bagus
    Rizky, Amalia Novia
    Mukti, Nabilah Hanifah
    MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 35 (01): : 143 - 149
  • [35] Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review
    Henegar, C. E.
    Eudy, A. M.
    Kharat, V.
    Hill, D. D.
    Bennett, D.
    Haight, B.
    LUPUS, 2016, 25 (06) : 617 - 626
  • [36] Effect of vitamin D supplementation on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review
    Sousa, Joyce Ramalho
    Cunha Rosa, Erica Patricia
    de Oliveira Costa Nunes, Ivone Freires
    Resende Goncalves de Carvalho, Cecilia Maria
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE REUMATOLOGIA, 2017, 57 (05) : 466 - 471
  • [37] Burden of autoantibodies and association with disease activity and damage in systemic lupus erythematosus
    Touma, Z.
    Gladman, D. D.
    Tulloch-Reid, D.
    Toloza, S. M.
    Ibanez, D.
    Fortin, P. R.
    Urowitz, M. B.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 28 (04) : 525 - 531
  • [38] Predictive models of infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic literature review
    Restrepo-Escobar, Mauricio
    Granda-Carvajal, Paula A.
    Aguirre, Daniel C.
    Hernandez-Zapata, Johanna
    Vasquez, Gloria M.
    Jaimes, Fabian
    LUPUS, 2021, 30 (03) : 421 - 430
  • [39] Clinical significance of peripheral nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Relation to disease activity and damage index
    Niazy, Marwa H.
    Fakhry, George N.
    Fawzy, Samar M.
    EGYPTIAN RHEUMATOLOGIST, 2023, 45 (02) : 177 - 181
  • [40] Leukopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia in systemic lupus erythematosus: Prevalence and clinical impact-A systematic literature review
    Linda, Carli
    Chiara, Tani
    Sabrina, Vagnani
    Viola, Signorini
    Marta, Mosca
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2015, 45 (02) : 190 - 194