Clinical composite measures of disease activity and damage used to evaluate patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic literature review

被引:8
|
作者
Castrejon, Isabel [1 ]
Rua-Figueroa, Inigo [2 ]
Piedad Rosario, Maria [3 ]
Carmona, Loreto [4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Hosp Joint Dis, Sch Med, Dept Med,Div Reumatol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Hosp Dr Negrin, Dept Reumatol, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain
[3] Soc Espanola Reumatol, Unidad Invest, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Camilo Jose Cela, Inst Salud Musculoesquelet, Madrid, Spain
来源
REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA | 2014年 / 10卷 / 05期
关键词
Validation; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Disease activity; Damage; Systematic review;
D O I
10.1016/j.reuma.2014.01.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the most appropriate indices to evaluate the disease activity and damage in patients with sytemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify validation studies of indices used to evaluate disease activity and damage. We collected information for each instrument on every aspect of validation including feasibility, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change using ad hoc forms. Results: A total of 38 articles were included addressing the validation of 6 composite indices to evaluate disease activity (BILAG, ECLAM, SLAM, SLEDAI, LAI and SLAQ); and 3 indices to evaluate damage (SLICC/ACE-DI, LDIQand BILD). Only the SLAQ, LIDIQand the BILD were self-administered. Feasibility and internal consistency was only studied in 3 indices (BILAG, SLAQ and SDI) with a Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.35 to 0.87. The intra-observer reliability was examined by the intraclass correlation coefficient for BILAG with a result of 0.48 (95%CI: 0,23-0,81) and using analysis of variance for SLAM-R (0,78), SLEDAI (0,33) and the LAI (0,81). The inter-observer feasibility was evaluated using the correlation coefficient for ECLAM (0,90-0,93), the SLAM (0,86) and MEX-SLEDAI (0,97-0,89). The construct validity was examined by means of convergence with other instruments, specifically with global assessment by the physician, with similar results between indices (0,48-0,75). Lastly, responsiveness was tested in all indices except LAI, SDI and LDIQ, with a standardized response mean ranging from 0.12 to 0.75. Conclusions: Although multiple instruments have been validated for use in SLE it was not possible to find direct evidence of which is the most appropriate. BILAG and SLEDAI, with moderate feasibility and low responsiveness, are the 2 indices with a most complete validation and more extensively used 2013 Elsevier Espafia, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 320
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can procalcitonin be used to distinguish between disease flare and infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review
    Ilaria Serio
    Laurent Arnaud
    Alexis Mathian
    Pierre Hausfater
    Zahir Amoura
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2014, 33 : 1209 - 1215
  • [2] Can procalcitonin be used to distinguish between disease flare and infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review
    Serio, Ilaria
    Arnaud, Laurent
    Mathian, Alexis
    Hausfater, Pierre
    Amoura, Zahir
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 33 (09) : 1209 - 1215
  • [3] Measurement of lupus activity and cumulative damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
    Alejandro Vera-Rivero, Daniel
    Chirino-Sanchez, Leonel
    Martinez Lastre, Ariel
    REVISTA CUBANA DE REUMATOLOGIA, 2019, 21 (02):
  • [4] Achieving remission or low disease activity is associated with better outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review
    Ugarte-Gil, Manuel Francisco
    Mendoza-Pinto, Claudia
    Reategui-Sokolova, Cristina
    Pons-Estel, Guillermo J.
    van Vollenhoven, Ronald F.
    Bertsias, George
    Alarcon, Graciela S.
    Pons-Estel, Bernardo A.
    LUPUS SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [5] Disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with end-stage renal disease: systematic review of the literature
    Patrícia Mattos
    Mittermayer B. Santiago
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2012, 31 : 897 - 905
  • [6] Disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with end-stage renal disease: systematic review of the literature
    Mattos, Patricia
    Santiago, Mittermayer B.
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 31 (06) : 897 - 905
  • [7] Benefits & risks of physical activity in patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: a systematic review of the literature
    Blaess, Julien
    Goepfert, Thibaut
    Geneton, Sophie
    Irenee, Elise
    Gerard, Hugo
    Taesch, Felix
    Sordet, Christelle
    Arnaud, Laurent
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2023, 58
  • [8] Measuring Disease Activity and Damage with Validated Metrics: A Systematic Review on Mortality and Damage in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    Keeling, Stephanie O.
    Vandermeer, Ben
    Medina, Jorge
    Chatterley, Trish
    Nevskaya, Tatiana
    Pope, Janet
    Alaburubalnabi, Zainab
    Bissonauth, Asvina
    Touma, Zahi
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 45 (10) : 1448 - 1461
  • [9] Quality of life measures in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A systematic review
    Radin, M.
    El Hasbani, G.
    Barinotti, A.
    Roccatello, D.
    Uthman, I
    Taher, A.
    Sciascia, S.
    REUMATISMO, 2021, 73 (04) : 208 - 228
  • [10] Improving measures of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus
    Banjari, Maher
    Touma, Zahi
    Gladman, Dafna D.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 19 (02) : 193 - 202