Experimental validaton of peripheral dose distribution of electron beams for eclipse electron Monte Carlo algorithm

被引:1
|
作者
Acar, Hilal [1 ]
Caglar, Mustafa [1 ]
Altinok, Ayse Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
electron beams; eMC; GGPB.EBT3; film; peripheral dose distribution;
D O I
10.1017/S1460396917000784
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim: The accuracy of two calculation algorithms of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS), the electron Monte Carlo algorithm (eMC) and general Gaussian pencil beam algorithm (GGPB) for calculating peripheral dose distribution of electron beams was investigated. Methods: Peripheral dose measurements were carried out for 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 22 MeV electron beams using parallel plate ionisation chamber and EBT3 film in the slab phantom. Measurements were performed for 6 x 6, 10 x 10 and 25 x 25 cm(2) cone sizes at d(max) of each energy up to 20 cm beyond the field edges. The measured and TPS calculated data were compared. Results: The TPS underestimated the out-of-field doses. The difference between measured and calculated doses increase with the cone size. For ionisation chamber measurement, the largest deviation between calculated and measured doses is <4.29% using the eMC, but can increase up to 8.72% of the distribution using GGPB. For film measurement, the minimum gamma analysis passing rates between measured and calculated dose distributions for all field sizes and energies used in this study were 91.2 and 74.7% for eMC and GGPB, respectively. Findings: The use of GGPB for planning large field treatments with 6 MeV could lead to inaccuracies of clinical significance.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 288
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measurement-based validation of a commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beams
    Pittomvils, Geert
    Bogaert, Evelien
    Traneus, Erik
    Thysebaert, Pieternel
    De Wagter, Carlos
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (07) : 4755 - 4767
  • [22] Evaluation of an electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron beam radiotherapy
    Hu, A.
    Song, H.
    Chen, Z.
    Zhou, S.
    Yin, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2099 - 2099
  • [23] Monte Carlo N Particle code - Dose distribution of clinical electron beams in inhomogeneous phantoms
    Nedaie, H. A.
    Mosleh-Shirazi, M. A.
    Allahverdi, M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 38 (01) : 15 - 21
  • [24] Evaluation of the usefulness of the electron Monte Carlo algorithm for planning radiotherapy with the use of electron beams
    LUKOMSKA, Sandra
    KUKOLOWICZ, Pawel
    ZAWADZKA, Anna
    GRUDA, Mariusz
    GIZYNSKA, Marta
    JANKOWSKA, Anna
    PIZIORSKA, Maria
    POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 22 (03): : 49 - 54
  • [25] Evaluation of the accuracy of the electron Monte Carlo algorithm in eclipse treatment planning system
    Ge, W.
    Wong, P.
    Kalach, N.
    Osterman, S.
    Stein, N.
    Berson, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2101 - 2101
  • [26] Study of the Eclipse Electron Monte Carlo Algorithm for Patient Specific MU Calculations
    Wang, X.
    Qi, S.
    Agazaryan, N.
    DeMarco, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 294 - 294
  • [27] A Monte Carlo Dose Calculation Framework for Electron Beams On Varian TrueBeam
    Rodrigues, A.
    Sawkey, D.
    Yin, F.
    Wu, Q.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 314 - +
  • [28] Evaluation of the RayStation electron Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm
    Richmond, Neil
    Allen, Vincent
    Wyatt, Jonathan
    Codling, Richard
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (02) : 159 - 167
  • [29] Improved Electron Monte Carlo Dose Calculation for Low Energy Electron Beams Using EMC
    Fix, M. K.
    Frei, D.
    Volken, W.
    Neuenschwander, H.
    Born, E. J.
    Manser, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [30] Evaluation of Inhomogeneity Calculations for Electron Beams in Raystation Monte Carlo Algorithm
    Sansourekidou, P.
    Allen, C.
    Pavord, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 260 - 260