Test-Retest Reliability of the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey Instrument

被引：23

作者：

Calzone, Kathleen A. ^{[1
]}

Culp, Stacey ^{[2
]}

Jenkins, Jean ^{[3
]}

Caskey, Sarah ^{[4
]}

Edwards, Pamela B. ^{[5
]}

Fuchs, Mary Ann ^{[5
]}

Reints, Amber ^{[6
]}

Stange, Brita ^{[6
]}

Questad, Janice ^{[6
]}

Badzek, Laurie ^{[7
]}

机构：

[1] NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA

[2] West Virginia Univ, Dept Stat, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA

[3] NHGRI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA

[4] West Virginia Univ, Sch Nursing, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA

[5] Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Durham, NC USA

[6] Avera Behav Hlth Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD USA

[7] Univ North Carolina Wilmington, Sch Nursing, Wilmington, NC USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT | 2016年 / 24卷 / 01期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

nursing; genetics; genomics; survey; nursing practice; competency;

D O I：

10.1891/1061-3749.24.1.54

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

Background and Purpose: Assessment of nursing genomic competency is critical given increasing genomic applications to health care. The study aims were to determine the test-retest reliability of the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS), which measures this competency, and to revise the survey accordingly. Methods: Registered nurses (n = 232) working at 2 Magnet-designated hospitals participating in a multiinstitutional genomic competency study completed the GGNPS. Cohen's kappa and weighted kappa were used to measure the agreement of item responses between Time 1 and Time 2. Survey items were revised based on the results. Results: Mean agreement for the instrument was 0.407 (range = 0.150-1.000). Moderate agreement or higher was achieved in 39% of the items. Conclusions: GGNPS test-retest reliability was not optimal, and the instrument was refined based on the study findings. Further testing of the revised instrument is planned to assess the instrument performance.

引用

页码：54 / 68

页数：15

共 23 条

[11] A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].