Introduction to the Special Issue: The Literature Review in Information Systems

被引:0
作者
Tate, Mary [1 ]
Furtmueller, Elfi [2 ]
Everman, Joerg [3 ]
Bandara, Wasana [4 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ Wellington, Sch Informat Management, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Univ Innsbruck, STI Inst, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, St John, NF A1C 5S7, Canada
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, Business Proc Management Discipline, Sch Informat Syst, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
来源
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2015年 / 37卷
关键词
Literature Review; Research Methods; Information Systems Discipline; Conceptual Research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
There has been a flowering of scholarly interest in the literature review as a research method in the information systems discipline. We feel privileged to contribute to this conversation and introduce the work of the authors represented in this special issue. Some of the highlights include three new methods for conducting literature analysis and guidelines, tutorials, and approaches for coping with some of the challenges involved in carrying out a literature review. Of the three "new method" papers, one (ontological meta-analysis and synthesis) is entirely new, and two (stylized facts and critical discourse analysis) are novel in the information systems context. The other four paper address more general issues: the challenges of effective search strategies when confronted with the burgeoning volume of research available, a detailed tool-supported approach for conducting a rigorous review, a detailed tutorial for conducting a qualitative literature review, and a discussion of quality issues. Collectively, the papers place emphasis beyond the traditional "narrative synthesis" on the importance of selecting the appropriate approach for the research context and the importance of attention to quality and transparency at all stages of the process, regardless of which approach is adopted.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 111
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, DOI DOI 10.2307/249422
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS
[3]   Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 :471-499
[4]  
Bandara W, 2015, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V37, P154
[5]  
Boell S.K., 2014, J INFORM TECHNOLOGY, V30, P1
[6]   A critical analysis of media discourse on information technology: preliminary results of a proposed method for critical discourse analysis [J].
Cukier, Wendy ;
Ngwenyama, Ojelanki ;
Bauer, Robert ;
Middleton, Catherine .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2009, 19 (02) :175-196
[7]  
Diamantopoulos A, 2011, MIS QUART, V35, P335
[8]   The Fallacy of Formative Measurement [J].
Edwards, Jeffrey R. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2011, 14 (02) :370-388
[9]  
Evermann J, 2014, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V34, P1481
[10]   Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review [J].
Greenhalgh, T ;
Robert, G ;
Macfarlane, F ;
Bate, P ;
Kyriakidou, O ;
Peacock, R .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 61 (02) :417-430