The Neuropsychologist as Expert Witness: Testimony in Civil and Criminal Settings

被引:2
作者
Richards, Paul M. [1 ]
Tussey, Chriscelyn M. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Bellevue Hosp Ctr, Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
Expert witness; Testimony; Personal injury litigation; Criminal forensic; Neuropsychological assessment; Civil neuropsychology; Criminal neuropsychology;
D O I
10.1007/s12207-013-9148-9
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The niche of forensic neuropsychology and use of neuropsychologists as expert witnesses has proliferated over the past two decades. Neuropsychologists conduct evaluations or provide consultation to assist triers of fact in both civil and criminal arenas. This article delivers a succinct overview of an array of factors that warrant consideration from the time of referral for a neuropsychological evaluation through the delivery of a verdict or settlement and receipt of payment for services. Readers are offered a primer on relevant legal criteria, distinctions between court settings, and applicable ethical standards and guidelines. Suggestions are made regarding the expertwitness retention agreement and strategies for direct and cross examination are reviewed. Logistical and liability considerations are also explored. Real world examples are included to illustrate some of the obstacles that neuropsychologist expert witnesses may encounter.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 74
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychology [J].
不详 .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2013, 68 (01) :7-19
[2]  
American Judicature Society, 2012, JUR IN DEPTH JUR DEC
[3]  
American Psychological Association, 2017, CAN COD ETH PSYCH, DOI [10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Am Psychol, V65, P493, DOI 10.1037/a0020168
[5]  
Babitsky S., 2012, BE EFFECTIVE EXPERT
[6]  
Babitsky S., 2006, A Z GUIDE EXPERT WIT
[7]  
Barth J T, 1991, Neuropsychol Rev, V2, P251, DOI 10.1007/BF01109048
[8]  
Brodsky S. L, 1991, TESTIFYING COURT GUI
[9]  
Brodsky S. L., 2013, TESTIFYING COURT GUI, P123, DOI [10.1037/14037-029, DOI 10.1037/14037-029]
[10]  
Bush S. S., 2006, ETHICAL ISSUES FOREN