Post-occupancy Evaluation and Thermal Comfort: State of the Art and New Approaches

被引:38
作者
Gossauer, Elke [1 ]
Wagner, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Karlsruhe, Bldg Phys & Tech Bldg Serv, Englerstr 7, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
comfort research methods; post-occupancy evaluation; workplace; comfort parameters; thermal comfort; indoor climate; general satisfaction;
D O I
10.1080/17512549.2007.9687273
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Building occupants are a valuable source of information on building performance as well as indoor environmental quality and their effects on comfort and productivity. A large number of different studies have been carried out over recent decades focusing on various aspects of the broad field of comfort, well-being and health at workplaces. Two main methodical approaches can be identified analysing the history of comfort research: laboratory tests in climate chambers, and field tests in running buildings. Advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are pointed out in this paper and some of the most well-known studies from Europe and the US are described with respect to their specific objectives and methodologies. No difference is made between pure comfort field studies and more general post-occupancy evaluations because the borderline is vague in most cases and the purpose of this paper is to collect as much useful information as possible on comfort research methods. A current study on overall comfort at workplaces introduces a new multivariate approach, including building-related and further contextual parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 175
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Post-occupancy evaluation of healing gardens in a pediatric cancer center [J].
Sherman, SA ;
Varni, JW ;
Ulrich, RS ;
Malcarne, VL .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2005, 73 (2-3) :167-183
[42]   A post-occupancy strategy to improve thermal comfort in social housing in a tropical highland climate: A case study in Bogota, Colombia [J].
Rodriguez, C. M. ;
Medina, J. M. ;
Pinzon, A. ;
Garcia, A. .
INFORMES DE LA CONSTRUCCION, 2019, 71 (555)
[43]   Improving Post-Occupancy Evaluation Engagement Using Social Robots [J].
Liang, Wei ;
Xiong, Ruoxin ;
Liu, Pengkun ;
Tang, Pingbo ;
Cochran, Erica .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 THE 9TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS FOR ENERGY-EFFICIENT BUILDINGS, CITIES, AND TRANSPORTATION, BUILDSYS 2022, 2022, :159-167
[44]   Is it hot in here or is it just me? Validating the post-occupancy evaluation [J].
Deuble, Max Paul ;
de dear, Richard John .
INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 6 (02) :112-134
[45]   Implementing post-occupancy evaluation in social housing complemented with BIM: A case study in Chile [J].
Gonzalez-Caceres, Alex ;
Bobadilla, Ariel ;
Karlshoj, Jan .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 158 :260-280
[46]   Association between Building Characteristics and Indoor Environmental Quality through Post-Occupancy Evaluation [J].
Bortolini, Rafaela ;
Forcada, Nuria .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (06)
[47]   A socio-technical approach to post-occupancy evaluation: interactive adaptability in domestic retrofit [J].
Chiu, Lai Fong ;
Lowe, Robert ;
Raslan, Rokia ;
Altamirano-Medina, Hector ;
Wingfield, Jez .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2014, 42 (05) :574-590
[48]   Post-occupancy evaluation of 20 office buildings as basis for future IEQ standards and guidelines [J].
Choi, Joon-Ho ;
Loftness, Vivian ;
Aziz, Azizan .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 46 :167-175
[49]   Understanding Post-occupancy Evaluation Processes for Public Healthcare Facilities in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand [J].
Blanch, Shari ;
Frazer, Annabel .
HERD-HEALTH ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH & DESIGN JOURNAL, 2023, 16 (04) :69-81
[50]   Get the picture? Lessons learned from a smartphone-based post-occupancy evaluation [J].
O'Brien, William ;
Schweiker, Marcel ;
Day, Julia K. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 56