SUBHYPNOTIC DOSES OF PROPOFOL RELIEVE PRURITUS INDUCED BY EPIDURAL AND INTRATHECAL MORPHINE

被引:103
作者
BORGEAT, A
WILDERSMITH, OHG
SAIAH, M
RIFAT, K
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Geneva
关键词
ANALGESICS; EPIDURAL; MORPHINE; ANESTHETICS; INTRAVENOUS; PROPOFOL; ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES; INTRATHECAL; COMPLICATIONS; PRURITUS;
D O I
10.1097/00000542-199204000-00004
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We investigated the efficacy of subhypnotic doses of propofol for spinal morphine-induced pruritus in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Fifty patients, ASA physical status 1-3, with spinal morphine-induced pruritus were allocated to receive either 1 ml propofol (10 mg) or 1 ml placebo (Intralipid) intravenously after gynecologic, orthopedic, thoracic, or gastrointestinal surgery. In the absence of a positive response, a second drug treatment was given 5 min later. The persistence of pruritus 5 min after the second treatment dose was considered a treatment failure. All failures then received, in an open fashion, a supplementary dose of propofol (10 mg) and were reevaluated 5 min later. Both groups were well matched. The success rate was significantly greater in the propofol group (84%) than in the placebo (16%) group (P < 0.05). Ninety percent of the treatment failures in the placebo group were successfully treated by a supplementary dose of 10 mg propofol. Eight percent of the patients (4% in each group) were resistant to all treatments, including naloxone 0.08 mg intravenously. Three patients had a slight increase in sedation in the propofol group versus none in control (not significant). The beneficial effect of treatment was longer than 60 min in 85% of patients in the propofol group and in 100% of the controls (not significant). These results suggest that propofol in a subhypnotic dose is an efficient drug treatment for spinal morphine-induced pruritus. At the dose administered (10 mg), side effects were rare and minor.
引用
收藏
页码:510 / 512
页数:3
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ABBOUD TK, 1988, ANESTH ANALG, V67, P137
[2]  
ABBOUD TK, 1990, ANESTH ANALG, V71, P367
[3]   A COMPARISON OF THE INCIDENCE OF PRURITUS FOLLOWING EPIDURAL OPIOID ADMINISTRATION IN THE PARTURIENT [J].
ACKERMAN, WE ;
JUNEJA, MM ;
KACZOROWSKI, DM ;
COLCLOUGH, GW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1989, 36 (04) :388-391
[4]   ITCHING AFTER EPIDURAL AND SPINAL OPIATES [J].
BALLANTYNE, JC ;
LOACH, AB ;
CARR, DB .
PAIN, 1988, 33 (02) :149-160
[5]   DIFFERENTIAL EXCITATORY AND INHIBITORY EFFECTS OF OPIATES ON NON-NOCICEPTIVE AND NOCICEPTIVE NEURONS IN SPINAL-CORD OF CAT [J].
BELCHER, G ;
RYALL, RW .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1978, 145 (02) :303-314
[6]  
BORGEAT A, 1991, REGION ANESTH, V16, P245
[7]   BRAIN AND SPINAL-CORD METABOLIC-ACTIVITY DURING PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA [J].
CAVAZZUTI, M ;
PORRO, CA ;
BARBIERI, A ;
GALETTI, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 66 (04) :490-495
[8]  
COUSINS MJ, 1984, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V61, P276
[9]   A BLINDED STUDY USING NALBUPHINE FOR PREVENTION OF PRURITUS INDUCED BY EPIDURAL FENTANYL [J].
DAVIES, GG ;
FROM, R .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1988, 69 (05) :763-765
[10]   EPIDURAL MORPHINE FOR ANALGESIA AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION - A REPORT OF 4880 PATIENTS [J].
FULLER, JG ;
MCMORLAND, GH ;
DOUGLAS, MJ ;
PALMER, L .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1990, 37 (06) :636-640