Real-time brachytherapy for prostate cancer - implant analysis

被引:5
作者
Szlag, Marta [1 ]
Slosarek, Krzysztof [1 ]
Rembielak, Agate [2 ]
Bialas, Brygida [2 ]
Fijalkowski, Marek [2 ]
Bystrzycka, Joanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Ctr Oncol Inst, Dept Treatment Planning, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
[2] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Ctr Oncol Inst, Dept Brachytherapy, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
关键词
real-time brachytherapy; interstitial implant; prostate volume;
D O I
10.1016/S1507-1367(10)60076-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background In HDR brachytherapy precision of catheter implantation is crucial for conformal treatment planning as a starting point for better optimization process. Aim The aim was to investigate differences between virtual and real needle position and the effect of needle displacement on dosimetric parameters as a function of prostate volume for better evaluation of "real" implant with respect to final dose distribution. Materials/Methods Thirty treatment plans calculated by Nucletron SWIFT (TM) were randomly selected. Dosimetric data including V100 for prostate gland and D10 for urethra were analyzed as a function of prostate volume and needle displacement. Needle displacement was determined by measuring the distance between virtual and real positions of respective needles in three sectional images: at the base, apex of the prostate gland and reference image. Dosimetric parameters were determined for consecutive computer plans: virtual (before implantation), live (after implantation and renewed optimization). For the purpose of this study a new parameter, VD (Volume-Dose), was created. Results VD indicates the quality of "real" dose distribution with respect to "virtual" treatment plan. In order to realize the assumption of virtual plan (VD<1) for a given prostate volume, mean values of needle displacement r should not exceed r(acceptable) according to the formula: r(acceptable) (V-p) proportional to Vp(2). For larger glands (above 30cc) final dose distribution is less dependent on needle displacement than smaller ones. Conclusions The experiment determined maximum values of needle displacement for a given Vp parameter, allowing one to take advantage of optimization algorithms and to improve the final dose distribution.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 14
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Analysis of interaction between number of implant catheters and dose-volume histograms in prostate highdose-rate brachytherapy using a computer model
    Charra-Brunaud, C
    Hsu, ICJ
    Weinberg, V
    Pouliot, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 56 (02): : 586 - 591
  • [2] Fijalkowski M, 2005, NOWOTWORY, V55, P58
  • [3] GEC/ESTRO-EAU recommendations on temporary brachytherapy using stepping sources for localised prostate cancer
    Kovács, G
    Pötter, R
    Loch, T
    Hammer, J
    Kolkman-Deurloo, IK
    de la Rosette, JJMCH
    Bertermann, H
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 74 (02) : 137 - 148
  • [4] Measurement of prostate rotation during insertion of needles for brachytherapy
    Lagerburg, V
    Moerland, MA
    Lagendijk, JJW
    Battermann, JJ
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 77 (03) : 318 - 323
  • [5] Martin T, 2004, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V180, P225, DOI 10.1007/s00066-004-1215-4
  • [6] High dose-rate afterloading 192Iridium prostate brachytherapy:: Feasibility report
    Mate, TP
    Gottesman, JE
    Hatton, J
    Gribble, M
    Van Hollebeke, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 41 (03): : 525 - 533
  • [7] Is there a role for postimplant dosimetry after real-time dynamic permanent prostate brachytherapy?
    Potters, Louis
    Calugaru, Emel
    Jassal, Anup
    Presser, Joseph
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (04): : 1014 - 1019
  • [8] Prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetry: A comparison of suture-embedded and loose seed implants
    Spadinger, Ingrid
    Hilts, Michelle
    Keyes, Mira
    Smith, Clarke
    Sidhu, Sabeena
    Morris, William J.
    [J]. BRACHYTHERAPY, 2006, 5 (03) : 165 - 173
  • [9] Stone Nelson N, 2003, Brachytherapy, V2, P17, DOI 10.1016/S1538-4721(03)00005-9
  • [10] Optimization of dose distribution for HDR brachytherapy of the prostate using attraction-repulsion model
    Sumida, I
    Shiomi, H
    Yoshioka, Y
    Inoue, T
    Lessard, E
    Hsu, ICJ
    Pouliot, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (02): : 643 - 649