Privatisation and pensions: what does this mean for women?

被引:19
作者
Foster, Liam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Sociol Studies, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
pension; gender; privatisation;
D O I
10.1332/175982711X573978
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper considers the relationship between gender and private pension provision. It provides a brief history of private pensions before considering the implications of pension policy on women's private pension situation under New Labour and, briefly, the coalition government. For instance, there has been an emphasis on neoliberal concerns of private saving and individual responsibility as a means of reducing expenditure and encouraging long-term sustainability. The paper suggests that the focus on individual responsibility in pension saving leaves many women ill-equipped to save and dependent on means-tested pension provision, largely as a result of intermittent work histories.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 115
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Gough O., 2004, EMPL RELAT, V26, P480
  • [22] Hawthorne S., 2010, PENSIONS WORLD
  • [23] Hermes S., 2007, ADV IND LABOR RELATI, V16, P161
  • [24] HILL M, 2007, PENSIONS
  • [25] Independent Public Sector Pensions Commission, 2010, IND PUBL SERV PENS C
  • [26] Insley J., 2011, GUARDIAN
  • [27] Maltby T., 2008, SOCIAL POLICY REV 20
  • [28] Mann K., 2005, BENEFITS, V13, P104
  • [29] Remembering and Rethinking the Social Divisions of Welfare: 50 Years On
    Mann, Kirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2009, 38 : 1 - 18
  • [30] McKay S., 2008, MODERNISING WELFARE