Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: the Leipzig experience

被引:23
作者
Lehmann, Sven [1 ]
Merk, Denis R. [1 ]
Etz, Christian D. [1 ]
Seeburger, Joerg [1 ]
Schroeter, Thomas [1 ]
Oberbach, Andreas [1 ]
Uhlemann, Madlen [2 ]
Hoellriegel, Robert [2 ]
Haensig, Martin [1 ]
Leontyev, Sergey [1 ]
Garbade, Jens [1 ]
Misfeld, Martin [1 ]
Mohr, Friedrich W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Heart Ctr Leipzig, Dept Cardiac Surg, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Heart Ctr Leipzig, Dept Cardiol, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Minimal invasive; aortic valve replacement (AVR); short-term survival; long-term survival; surgical technique;
D O I
10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.11.03
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Minimally invasive techniques are progressively challenging traditional approaches in cardiothoracic surgery. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) has become a routine procedure at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing minimally invasive isolated AVR between January 2003 and March 2014, at our institution. Mean follow-up was 4.7 +/- 4.3 years (range: 0-18 years) and was 99.8% complete. Results: There were 1,714 patients who received an isolated minimally invasive AVR. The mean (+/- SD) patient age was 65 +/- 12.8 years, ejection fraction 60%+/- 12% and log EuroSCORE 5.3%+/- 5.1%. Mean cross-clamp time was 58 +/- 18 minutes and mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 82.9 +/- 26.7 minutes. Thirty-day survival was 97.8%+/- 0.4%, and 69.4%+/- 1.7% at 10-years. The multivariate analysis revealed age at surgery [P=0.016; odds ratio (OR), 1.1], length of surgery time (P=0.002; OR, 1.01), female gender (P=0.023; OR, 3.54), preoperative myocardial infarction (MI) (P=0.006; OR, 7.87), preoperative stroke (P=0.001; OR, 13.76) and preoperative liver failure (P=0.015; OR, 10.28) as independent risk factors for mortality. Cox-regression analysis revealed the following predictors for long term mortality: age over 75 years (P<0.001; OR, 3.5), preoperative dialysis (P<0.01; OR, 2.14), ejection fraction less than 30% (P=0.003; OR, 3.28) and urgent or emergency operation (P<0.001; OR, 2.3). Conclusions: Minimally invasive AVR can be performed safely and effectively with very few perioperative complications. The early and long-term outcomes in these patients are acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 56
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] One thousand minimally invasive valve operations
    Mihaljevic, T
    Cohn, LH
    Unic, D
    Aranki, SF
    Couper, GS
    Byrne, JG
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (03) : 529 - 534
  • [22] Misfeld M, 2007, J HEART VALVE DIS, V16, P648
  • [23] Minimal access aortic valve replacement: Is it worth it?
    Murtuza, Bari
    Pepper, John R.
    DeL Stanbridge, Rex
    Jones, Catherine
    Rao, Christopher
    Darzi, Ara
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 85 (03) : 1121 - 1131
  • [24] J incision minimal-access valve operations
    Svensson, LG
    D'Agostino, RS
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1998, 66 (03) : 1110 - 1112
  • [25] Early and late outcomes of 1000 minimally invasive aortic valve operations
    Tabata, Minoru
    Umakanthan, Ramanan
    Cohn, Lawrence H.
    Bolman, Ralph Morton, III
    Shekar, Prern S.
    Chen, Frederick Y.
    Couper, Gregory S.
    Aranki, Sary F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 33 (04) : 537 - 541