Collective trust: a social indicator of instructional capacity

被引:17
作者
Adams, Curt [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Educ Leadership & Policy Studies, Educ Leadership & Policy Studies, Tulsa, OK 74135 USA
关键词
Instructional capacity; Collective trust; School improvement; Trust; Schools; Performance management;
D O I
10.1108/09578231311311519
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to test the validity of using collective trust as a social indicator of instructional capacity. Design/methodology/approach - A hypothesized model was advanced for the empirical investigation. Collective trust was specified as a latent construct with observable indicators being principal trust in faculty (PTF), faculty trust in principal (FTP), faculty trust in colleagues (FTC), and faculty trust in students (FTS). It was hypothesized that enabling school structure is directly related to the latent collective trust construct and collective trust is directly related to school performance. Data were collected in the spring of 2010/11 from teachers and students in 85 schools in an urban school district in a southwestern state. A partially latent structural regression model was tested in AMOS 7.0. Findings - Results of the measurement model support the theoretical relationship among faculty trust in principal, faculty trust in colleagues, faculty trust in students, and principal trust in faculty. Both directional hypotheses were supported: enabling school structure had a strong, direct effect on a culture collective trust and collective trust had a strong, direct effect on school performance. Research limitations/implications - The sample consisted of schools in one urban district in the southwestern part of the USA, and collective trust only operationalized the social dimension of instructional capacity. Practical implications - Regular and consistent measures of collective trust have the potential to improve how administrators at site and district levels manage the implementation of improvement strategies designed to build capacity. Originality/value - Many theoretical discussions treat trust as a constitutive property of capacity building, but few studies have empirically tested a priori models that specify relationships among structures and processes aligned with instructional capacity, collective trust, and school performance.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / +
页数:21
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Adams C, 2010, RES THEOR EDUC ADMIN, P255
[2]  
Adams CM, 2008, RES THEOR EDUC ADMIN, P29
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, DISRUPTING CLASS DIS
[4]  
Atteberry A., 2010, SOCIAL NETWORK THEOR, P51
[5]   Self-organisation and capacity building: sustaining the change [J].
Bain, Alan ;
Walker, Allan ;
Chan, Anissa .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, 2011, 49 (06) :701-+
[6]  
Barber Michael, 2009, SHAPING FUTURE GOOD
[7]   Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures [J].
Behn, RD .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2003, 63 (05) :586-606
[8]  
Berman P., 1978, FEDERAL PROGRAMS SUP, VIII
[9]   The science of improvement [J].
Berwick, Donald M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (10) :1182-1184
[10]  
Bliese P. D., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P349, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14