Eco-Efficiency Indicators for Urban Transport

被引:14
作者
Moriarty, Patrick [1 ]
Wang, Stephen Jia [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Design, Caulfield Campus, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES | 2015年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
Accessibility; Eco-efficiency indicators; Life Cycle Assessment; Urban transport;
D O I
10.13044/j.sdewes.2015.03.0015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on urban passenger transport eco-efficiency, which can be defined as the production of maximum benefits to society while minimising environmental impacts from urban transport's inputs of energy and materials. Researchers have intensively studied transport's varied environmental impacts, particularly through Life Cycle Assessment; this paper argues that primary transport energy per capita is presently the best measure of impact. Although transport's societal benefits have generally been regarded as self-evident, access to out-of-home activities, not passenger-km, should be considered as the fundamental useful output of an urban transport system, since transport is a derived demand. We argue that access levels are roughly similar in all high-income OECD cities, so that these cities can be ranked on transport eco-efficiency simply on the basis of per capita primary transport energy.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 195
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Traffic noise in LCA Part 2: Analysis of existing methods and proposition of a new framework for consistent, context-sensitive LCI modeling of road transport noise emission [J].
Althaus, Hans-Joerg ;
de Haan, Peter ;
Scholz, Roland W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2009, 14 (07) :676-686
[2]   Energy efficiency in transport and mobility from an eco-efficiency viewpoint [J].
Aranda Uson, Alfonso ;
Valero Capilla, Antonio ;
Zabalza Bribian, Ignacio ;
Scarpellini, Sabina ;
Llera Sastresa, Eva .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (04) :1916-1923
[3]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Census Results CD-rom, 2011, CENS RES CD ROM 2011
[4]   Why Cost Benefit Analysis is perceived as a problematic tool for assessment of transport plans: A process perspective [J].
Beukers, Els ;
Bertolini, Luca ;
Brommelstroet, Marco Te .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (01) :68-78
[5]  
BP, 2020, BP STAT REV WORLD EN
[6]  
Bureau of Infrastructure Transport and Regional Economics (BITRE), 2011, AUSTR INFR STAT YB 2
[7]  
Bureau of Infrastructure Transport and Regional Economics (BITRE), 2012, TRAFF GROWTH AUSTR R
[8]  
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS), 2014, 2014 POCK GUID TRANS
[9]   No Particular Place to Go An Empirical Analysis of Travel for the Sake of Travel [J].
Cao, Xinyu ;
Mokhtarian, Patricia L. ;
Handy, Susan L. .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2009, 41 (02) :233-257
[10]   Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Stromman, Anders Hammer .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (02) :437-451