Is laparoscopic appendectomy better choice compared to open appendectomy

被引:0
作者
Jamil, Munawar [1 ]
Ahmed, Afzaal [1 ]
Qamar, Shehzad Ahmad [1 ]
Tahir, Fatima [1 ]
Sobia, Humaira [1 ]
机构
[1] QAMC BVH, Dept Surg, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
来源
RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2018年 / 43卷 / 02期
关键词
Laparoscopic appendectomy; open appendectomy; appendectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare laparoscopic appendectomy to open appendectomy for operation time, complications, hospital stay, time off work, cosmetic effects and diagnostic accuracy above the age of 12 years, to see if it was better choiceas compared to open appendectomy, the existing gold standard. Methodology: It is a prospective non-randomized controlled 3 years trial conducted at QAMC/BVH Bahawalpur, Pakistan from October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2017. It included 290 patients of acute appendicitis, 138 were operated laparoscopically and 152 by open appendectomy. Operation time, complications, hospital stay, time off work, cosmetic effects and diagnostic accuracy were compared in two groups. Data analysis was done on SPSS version 23. Results: Mean age of patients was 25.19+10.19 in laparoscopic group and 26.08+10.71 in open appendectomy group. Of 290, 45(29.60%) were obese in open appendectomy and 47(31.15%) were obese in laparoscopic group. Operation time was 29.03 +/- 8.33 minutes in open group and 39.10 +/- 8.82 minutes in laparoscopic group. Hospital stay was 3.13 +/- 1.42 days and 2.05 +/- 1.34 days in open appendectomy and laparoscopicgroup, respectively. Time off work was 12.09 +/- 3.68 and 8.70 +/- 3.83 days in open appendectomy and laparoscopic group. Overall per-operative complications were 0.65% to 2.17 %(P=0.276) and postoperative were 18.42 to 9.42%(P=0.02) in open and laparoscopic group, respectively. Most significant was wound infection 9.86% to 3.62% in open and laparoscopic group, respectively. In obese patients, there was significant difference in complications in open (9.86%) to laparoscopic (2.89%) groups. Conversion and re-exploration were 00 to 2.17% and 2.63% to 1.44% in open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Diagnostic failure was 9.8% to 2.17% (P=0.005) in open and laparoscopic group. Patients were happy with scar in 72.46% in laparoscopic group and worried in 34.21% in open group. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy is better choiceabove the age of 12 years as compared to open appendectomy, even more feasible in obese patients.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 305
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF APPENDICITIS AND APPENDECTOMY IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
ADDISS, DG ;
SHAFFER, N ;
FOWLER, BS ;
TAUXE, RV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 132 (05) :910-925
[2]   Laparoscopic vs. open approach for colorectal cancer: evolution over time of minimal invasive surgery [J].
Biondi, Antonio ;
Grosso, Giuseppe ;
Mistretta, Antonio ;
Marventano, Stefano ;
Toscano, Chiara ;
Drago, Filippo ;
Gangi, Santi ;
Basile, Francesco .
BMC SURGERY, 2013, 13
[3]   A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy [J].
Chung, RS ;
Rowland, DY ;
Li, P ;
Diaz, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 177 (03) :250-256
[4]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in obese patients: A meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective studies [J].
Ciarrocchi, Andrea ;
Amicucci, Gianfranco .
JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2014, 10 (01) :4-9
[5]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Dai, Liping ;
Shuai, Jian .
UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 5 (04) :542-553
[6]   Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis [J].
Flum, DR ;
Morris, A ;
Koepsell, T ;
Dellinger, EP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (14) :1748-1753
[7]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis [J].
Golub, R ;
Siddiqui, F ;
Pohl, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (05) :545-553
[8]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy - Outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database [J].
Guller, U ;
Hervey, S ;
Purves, H ;
Muhlbaier, LH ;
Peterson, ED ;
Eubanks, S ;
Pietrobon, R .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (01) :43-52
[9]   Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: How to discourage surgeons using inadequate therapy [J].
Hori, Tomohide ;
Machimoto, Takafumi ;
Kadokawa, Yoshio ;
Hata, Toshiyuki ;
Ito, Tatsuo ;
Kato, Shigeru ;
Yasukawa, Daiki ;
Aisu, Yuki ;
Kimura, Yusuke ;
Sasaki, Maho ;
Takamatsu, Yuichi ;
Kitano, Taku ;
Hisamori, Shigeo ;
Yoshimura, Tsunehiro .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (32) :5849-5859
[10]   Amebiasis presenting as acute appendicitis: Report of a case and review of Japanese literature [J].
Ito, Daisuke ;
Hata, Shojirou ;
Seiichiro, Shimizu ;
Kobayashi, Kaoru ;
Teruya, Masanori ;
Kaminishi, Michio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2014, 5 (12) :1054-1057