Renal Function Recovery in Donors and Recipients after Live Donor Nephrectomy: Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic vs. Open Procedures

被引:1
作者
Kim, Bum Soo [1 ]
Yoo, Eun Sang [1 ]
Kim, Tae-Hwan [1 ]
Kwon, Tae Gyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, 200 Dongduk Ro, Daegu 700721, South Korea
关键词
Creatinine; Laparoscopy; Living donors; Transplant recipients;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2010.51.4.245
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is associated with less postoperative pain and faster recovery times in living kidney donors. However, pneumoperitoneum, which is required in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, can result in adverse effects on renal function in donors and recipients. We compared renal function in donors and recipients after hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) and open donor nephrectomy (ODN). Materials and Methods: Between January 1997 and January 2008, 241 live donor nephrectomies were performed by either HALDN (n=118) or ODN (n=123). Preoperative patient characteristics were not significantly different between the donors and recipients. We monitored the changes in serum creatinine levels of the donors and recipients preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 5, 28, 84, and 365. Results: The mean operative times of HALDN and ODN were 171 and 163 minutes (p=0.284), and the mean warm ischemic times were 292 and 236 seconds (p=0.207), respectively. The mean serum creatinine level in the recipients on postoperative day 1 was significantly higher after HALDN than after ODN (3.48 vs. 2.62 mg/dl, p=0.003). However, from postoperative day 5 to 1 year, there was no significant difference between the two groups. The mean serum creatinine level in the donors was not significantly different between the HALDN and ODN groups throughout the study period. Conclusions: Renal function recovery in the donors was similar with both HALDN and ODN. Graft renal function recovery after HALDN was comparable with that after ODN, except immediately after surgery (postoperative day 1).
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 249
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] A COMPARISON OF HAND-ASSISTED AND PURE LAPAROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES IN LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY
    Branco, Anibal Wood
    Kondo, William
    Branco Filho, Alcides Jose
    de George, Marco Aurelio
    Rangel, Marlon
    Stunitz, Luciano Carneiro
    [J]. CLINICS, 2008, 63 (06) : 795 - 800
  • [2] DOLS LF, 2009, TRANSPL INT
  • [3] Hand-assisted and conventional laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A comparison of two contemporary techniques
    Gershbein, AB
    Fuchs, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2002, 16 (07) : 509 - 513
  • [4] Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy
    Giessing, M
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 19 : 36 - 40
  • [5] Renal outcome 25 years after donor nephrectomy
    Goldfarb, DA
    Matin, SF
    Braun, WE
    Schreiber, MJ
    Mastroianni, B
    Papajcik, D
    Rolin, HA
    Flechner, S
    Goormastic, M
    Novick, AC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) : 2043 - 2047
  • [6] Long-term impact of pneumoperitoneum used for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy on renal function and histomorphology in donor and recipient rats
    Hazebroek, EJ
    de Bruin, RWF
    Bouvy, ND
    Marquet, RL
    Bonthuis, F
    Bajema, IM
    Hayes, DP
    Ijzermans, JNM
    Bonjer, HJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 237 (03) : 351 - 357
  • [7] 류기영, 2006, Investigative and Clinical Urology, V47, P1309
  • [8] AN EXPERIMENTAL-MODEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF RENAL RECOVERY FROM WARM ISCHEMIA
    JABLONSKI, P
    HOWDEN, BO
    RAE, DA
    BIRRELL, CS
    MARSHALL, VC
    TANGE, J
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1983, 35 (03) : 198 - 204
  • [9] Jacobs SC, 2000, J UROLOGY, V164, P1494, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67014-0
  • [10] 백승, 2005, Investigative and Clinical Urology, V46, P1125