A COMPARISON OF NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING THE ADVECTION EQUATION .2.

被引:38
作者
CHOCK, DP
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0004-6981(85)90036-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Five algorithms and their variations for solving the advection equation were compared in terms of their accuracy, speed and storage requirements. The algorithms are a chapeau-function method including mass-lumping, Forester''s method, a method called Filtering Remedy and Methodology, a Hermite-cubic orthogonal-collocation method and a quadratic function method. The test problem was the rotation of a cosine-shaped hill of concentration in a 2-dimensional circular velocity field at 3 different time increments (or angular velocities). The forward-Euler time-integration scheme coupled with a balancing diffusion term was extensively used and was found to be superior to the Crank-Nicolson scheme in accuracy for the methods considered. Together with the results of part I (Atmospheric Environment 1983), Forester''s method applied to the chapeau-function solution appears to be the best method for solving the advention equation in air-pollution modeling. The combined method retains the peak value well, has high accuracy with little or no negative concentration region, and requires short execution time and minimal memory storage.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 586
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING MULTICRITERION PROBLEMS [J].
EVTUSHENKO, IG ;
POTAPOV, MA .
DOKLADY AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1986, 291 (01) :25-29
[12]   NUMERICAL-METHODS OF SOLUTION FOR CONTINUOUS COUNTERCURRENT PROCESSES IN THE NONSTEADY STATE .2. APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL-METHODS [J].
TAN, KS ;
SPINNER, IH .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1984, 30 (05) :780-786
[13]   ON THE COMPARISON OF 2 NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR CONFORMAL MAPPING [J].
GAIER, D ;
PAPAMICHAEL, N .
IMA JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 1987, 7 (03) :261-282
[14]   A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING THE FORWARD PROBLEM IN EEG AND MEG [J].
PRUIS, GW ;
GILDING, BH ;
PETERS, MJ .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1993, 14 :A1-A9
[15]   A COMPARISON OF 3 NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS ON THE SPHERE [J].
BROWNING, GL ;
HACK, JJ ;
SWARZTRAUBER, PN .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 1989, 117 (05) :1058-1075
[16]   Fine-scale structures and negative-density regions: Comparison of numerical methods for solving the advection equation [J].
Brunetti, M ;
Grandgirard, V ;
Bertrand, P ;
Sauter, O ;
Vaclavik, J ;
Villard, L .
TRANSPORT THEORY AND STATISTICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 34 (3-5) :261-274
[17]   NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING INVERSE EIGENVALUE PROBLEMS [J].
NOCEDAL, J ;
OVERTON, ML .
LECTURE NOTES IN MATHEMATICS, 1983, 1005 :212-226
[19]   A comparison of some numerical methods in solving 1-D steady-state advection dispersion reaction equation [J].
Yudianto, D. ;
Xie Yuebo .
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 27 (02) :155-172
[20]   NUMERICAL-METHODS FOR SOLVING PROBLEMS OF OPTIMAL GENERALIZED CONTROL [J].
ORLOV, YV ;
RAZUMOVSKII, DD .
AUTOMATION AND REMOTE CONTROL, 1993, 54 (05) :740-746