EYESYS CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY MEASUREMENT APPLIED TO CALIBRATED ELLIPSOIDAL CONVEX SURFACES

被引:31
作者
DOUTHWAITE, WA
机构
[1] Department of Optometry, Bradford University, Bradford
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bjo.79.9.797
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Aims/Background-This study was carried out to assess the accuracy of the EyeSys videokeratoscope by using convex ellipsoidal surfaces of known form. Methods-PMMA convex ellipsoidal buttons were calibrated using Form Talysurf analysis which allowed subsequent calculation of the vertex radius and p value of the surface. The EyeSys videokeratoscope was used to examine the same ellipsoids. The tabular data provided by the instrument software were used to plot a graph of r(2) versus y(2) where r is the measured radius at y, the distance from the corneal point being measured to the surface vertex. The intercept on the ordinate of this graph gives the vertex radius and the slope the p value. The results arising from the Talysurf and the EyeSys techniques were compared. Results-The EyeSys videokeratoscope gave readings for both vertex radius and p value that were higher than those of the Talysurf analysis. The vertex radius was around 0 . 1 mm greater. The p value results were similar by the two methods for p values around unity but the EyeSys results were higher and the discrepancy increased as the p value approached that of a paraboloid. Conclusions-Although the videokeratoscope may be useful in comparative studies of the cornea, there must be some doubt about the absolute values displayed. The disagreement is sufficiently large to suggest that the instrument may not be accurate enough for contact lens fitting purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 801
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Antalis John J., 1993, CLAO (Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists) Journal, V19, P58
[2]   WHAT RADIUS DOES THE CONVENTIONAL KERATOMETER MEASURE [J].
BENNETT, AG ;
RABBETTS, RB .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1991, 11 (03) :239-247
[3]  
BENNETT AG, 1988, OPTOMETRY TODAY, V28, P238
[4]  
BLAND M, 1987, INTRO MED STATISTICS, P280
[5]   MATHEMATICAL-MODELS OF THE GENERAL CORNEAL SURFACE [J].
BUREK, H ;
DOUTHWAITE, WA .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1993, 13 (01) :68-72
[6]  
GUILLON M, 1986, OPHTHAL PHYSL OPT, V6, P47, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1986.tb00699.x
[7]   EVALUATING THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF TOPOGRAPHY SYSTEMS ON SPHERICAL SURFACES [J].
MAGUIRE, LJ ;
WILSON, SE ;
CAMP, JJ ;
VERITY, S .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1993, 111 (02) :259-262
[8]  
MANDELL RB, 1971, BRIT J PHYSIOL OPT, V26, P183
[9]  
McCarey Bernard E., 1992, CLAO (Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists) Journal, V18, P248
[10]  
MORROW GL, 1992, CAN J OPHTHALMOL, V27, P213