Comparison of an Indwelling Period Following Ureteroscopic Removal of Stones between Double-J Stents and Open-Ended Catheters: A Prospective, Pilot, Randomized, Multicenter Study

被引:3
作者
Moon, Kyong Tae [1 ]
Cho, Hee Ju [1 ]
Cho, Jeong Man [1 ]
Kang, Jeong Yoon [1 ]
Yoo, Tag Keun [1 ]
Moon, Hong Sang [2 ]
Lee, Seung Wook [2 ]
机构
[1] Eulji Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Pain; Ureteroscopy; Urinary Catheterization;
D O I
10.4111/kju.2011.52.10.698
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether long-term, postoperative ureteral stenting is necessary after ureteroscopic removal of stones (URS) during an uncomplicated surgical procedure. Materials and Methods: We prospectively examined 54 patients who underwent URS for lower ureteral stones from February 2010 to October 2010. Inclusion criteria were a stone less than 10 mm in diameter, absence of ureteral stricture, and absence of ureteral injury during surgery. We randomly placed 5 Fr. open-tip ureteral catheters in 26 patients and removed the Foley catheter at postoperative day 1. The remaining 28 patients received double-J stents that were removed at postoperative day 14 by cystoscopy under local anesthesia. All patients provided visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at postoperative days 1, 7, and 14 and completed the storage categories of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at postoperative day 7. Results: The VAS scores were not significantly different on postoperative day 1 but were significantly smaller in the 1-day ureteral catheter group at postoperative days 7 and 14 (p<0.01). All of the storage categories of the IPSS were significantly lower in the 1-day ureteral stent group (p<0.01). The ratio of patients who needed intravenous analgesics because of severe postoperative flank pain was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.81). No patients experienced severe flank pain after postoperative day 2, and no patients in either group had any other complications. Conclusions: One-day ureteral catheter placement after URS can reduce postoperative pain and did not cause specific complications compared with conventional double-J stent placement.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 702
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] ACUTE URETERIC DILATATION FOR URETEROSCOPY - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY
    BODDY, SAM
    NIMMON, CC
    JONES, S
    RAMSAY, JWA
    BRITTON, KE
    LEVISON, DA
    WHITIFIELD, HN
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 61 (01): : 27 - 31
  • [2] MORBIDITY ASSOCIATED WITH INDWELLING INTERNAL URETERAL STENTS AFTER SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    BREGG, K
    RIEHLE, RA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 141 (03) : 510 - 512
  • [3] A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing nonstented versus stented ureteroscopic lithotripsy
    Denstedt, JD
    Wollin, TA
    Sofer, M
    Nott, L
    Weir, M
    Honey, RJD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (05) : 1419 - 1422
  • [4] Dialadat H, 2007, EUR UROL, V52, P836
  • [5] EXPERIENCE WITH NEW DOUBLE J-URETERAL CATHETER STENT
    FINNEY, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1978, 120 (06) : 678 - 681
  • [6] Ureteroscopy: Current practice and long-term complications
    Harmon, WJ
    Sershon, PD
    Blute, ML
    Patterson, DE
    Segura, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [7] SELF-RETAINED INTERNAL URETERAL STENTS - NEW APPROACH
    HEPPERLEN, TW
    MARDIS, HK
    KAMMANDEL, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1978, 119 (06) : 731 - 734
  • [8] Routine placement of ureteral stents is unnecessary after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi
    Hollenbeck, BK
    Schuster, TG
    Faerber, GJ
    Wolf, JS
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (04) : 639 - 643
  • [9] Is stenting following ureteroscopy for removal of distal ureteral calculi necessary?
    Hosking, DH
    McColm, SE
    Smith, WE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (01) : 48 - 50
  • [10] Kim KS, 2006, KOREAN J UROL, V47, P1230