ASSESSING MITRAL-STENOSIS WITH DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY - LIMITATIONS OF THE PRESSURE HALF-TIME METHOD

被引:386
作者
TAYLOR, R
机构
[1] Department of Cardiology, Logan General Hospital, Logan, West Virginia
关键词
compliance; Doppler; pressure gradient; pressure half-time;
D O I
10.1177/875647939000600404
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Echocardiographic techniques have been used extensively in the noninvasive evaluation of mitral stenosis. Although mitral valve area can be reliably predicted by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) in selected patients, neither M-mode nor 2DE techniques provide any direct hemodynamic information. The subsequent utilization of Doppler techniques allows for interrogation of coexistent blood flow alterations and an estimate of the pressure gradient across the mitral valve using the modified Bernoulli equation. Since the pressure gradient is found to vary with flow volume, an additional Doppler technique using the concept of pressure half-time provides an assessment of the severity of mitral stenosis that is related to mitral valve area and independent of hemodynamic factors. Although several studies reporting good reliability have contributed to the widespread acceptance of the pressure half-time concept, recent reports have indicated significant limitations with the pressure half-time method leading to inaccuracies and poor reliability in predicting the mitral valve area. This review discusses the development of the pressure half-time concept and the implications of these recent research findings on the critical use of the Doppler pressure half-time method to estimate the mitral valve area. © 1990, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 223
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Weyman A.E., Cross-Sectional Echocardiography, pp. 151-162, (1982)
[2]  
Feigenbaum H., Echocardiography, pp. 249-262, (1986)
[3]  
DeMaria A.N., Miller R.R., Amsterdam E.A., Markson W., Mason D.T., Mitral valve early diastolic closing velocity in the echocardiogram: relation to sequential diastolic flow and ventricular compliance, Am J Cardiol, 37, pp. 693-701, (1976)
[4]  
Nichol P.N., Gilbert B.W., Kisslo J.A., Two-dimensioal echocardiographic assessment of mitral stenosis, Circulation, 55, pp. 120-128, (1977)
[5]  
Martin R.P., Rakowski H., Kleiman J.H., Et al., Reliability and reproducibility of two-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of the stenotic mitral valve orifice area, Am J Cardiol, 43, pp. 560-568, (1979)
[6]  
Smith M.D., Handshoe R., Handshoe S., Et al., Comparative accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiographic and Doppler pressure half-time methods in assessing severity of mitral stenosis in patients with and without prior commissurotomy, Circulation, 73, pp. 100-107, (1986)
[7]  
Bryg R.J., Williams G.A., Labovitz A.J., Et al., Effect of atrial fibrillation and mitral regurgitation on calculated mitral valve area in mitral stenosis, Am J Cardiol, 57, pp. 634-638, (1986)
[8]  
Stamm R.B., Martin R.P., Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultra-sound, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2, pp. 707-718, (1983)
[9]  
Adhar G.C., Nanda N.C., Adult valvular heart disease, Echocardiography, 1, pp. 219-241, (1984)
[10]  
Hatle L., Brubakk A., Tromsdal A., Angelsen B., Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound, Br Heart J, 40, pp. 131-140, (1978)