Living kidney donor transplants over a 16-year period in South Africa: A single center experience

被引:5
作者
Abdu, A. [1 ]
Morolo, N. [1 ]
Meyers, A. [1 ]
Wadee, S. [1 ]
Britz, R. [2 ]
Naicker, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Dept Internal Med, Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Acad Hosp, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Nephrol,Dept Sur, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
Living kidney donor; post-donation follow-up; reasons for non-donation; South Africa;
D O I
10.4103/1596-3519.82077
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The number of patients on the waiting list is increasing due to an imbalance between organ supply and demand. This has led to an increase in the number of living donor transplants in most parts of the world. The benefits to the recipients must, however, be weighed against the risks to the donors. Long-term follow-up of the donors is therefore imperative to ascertain the risks of living kidney donation. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 571 potential living kidney donors (PLDs) in Johannesburg hospital over a 16-year period between 1990 and 2005. Results: There were 1030 kidney transplants during this period, with 800 cadaveric and 230 actual living donor (ALD) transplants. There were 571 PLDs; however, 341 (59.7%) withdrew or were withdrawn because of medical and nonmedical reasons. Among the 230 ALDs, the mean age of the donors was 35.2 +/- 8.3 years; 55% were females; 24% were Blacks. Eighty-five percent were related to the recipients while 15% were unrelated. Mean duration of follow-up was 8.6 +/- 6.4 years. The pattern of post-donation follow-up was excellent in 29.7%, adequate in 34% and unacceptable/poor in 36.3%, based on the number of clinic visits post-donation. Hypertension was noted in 24% of the donors during long-term follow-up. Three of the donors also developed significant microalbuminuria. Conclusion: There is a need to encourage living kidney donation, especially amongst the Black populations, and to emphasize the value and significance of post-donation follow-up visits to all potential donors.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / +
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]   Reasons for not accepting living kidney donors [J].
FehrmanEkholm, I ;
Gabel, H ;
Magnusson, G .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1996, 61 (08) :1264-1265
[12]   Age, gender, race, and associations with kidney failure following living kidney donation [J].
Gibney, E. M. ;
Parikh, C. R. ;
Garg, A. X. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (05) :1337-1340
[13]   Renal outcome 25 years after donor nephrectomy [J].
Goldfarb, DA ;
Matin, SF ;
Braun, WE ;
Schreiber, MJ ;
Mastroianni, B ;
Papajcik, D ;
Rolin, HA ;
Flechner, S ;
Goormastic, M ;
Novick, AC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2043-2047
[14]  
JONES JW, 1993, TRANSPLANT P, V25, P3083
[15]   ABO-incompatible transplantation: Less may be more [J].
Montgomery, Robert A. ;
Locke, Jayme E. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 84 (12) :S8-S9
[16]   End-stage renal disease in sub-Saharan and South Africa [J].
Naicker, S .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 63 :119-122
[17]  
Naicker S., 1998, AJN, V2, P18
[18]   Long-term (20-37 years) follow-up of living kidney donors [J].
Ramcharan, T ;
Matas, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (10) :959-964
[19]  
Sahay M, 2007, J ASSOC PHYSICIAN I, V55, P263
[20]   Long-term follow-up of kidney donors: a longitudinal study [J].
Saran, R ;
Marshall, SM ;
Madsen, R ;
Keavey, P ;
Tapson, JS .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 12 (08) :1615-1621