Construction project selection using fuzzy TOPSIS approach

被引:60
作者
Tan, Yong-tao [1 ]
Shen, Li-yin [1 ]
Langston, Craig [2 ]
Liu, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Bldg & Real Estate Dept, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Bond Univ, Fac Business Technol & Sustainable Dev, Robina, Qld, Australia
关键词
Tendering; Project evaluation; Decision making; Simulation;
D O I
10.1108/17465661011092669
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a quantitative method for assisting contractors to select appropriate projects for bidding by considering multiple attributes and integrating decision group member opinions. Design/methodology/approach - The fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method is used to help contractors make decision on project selection and the linguistic terms are defined for representing the triangular fuzzy numbers for ratings of alternatives and weights of criteria. Findings - The selection of appropriate projects for bidding is a multiple attribute group decision-making exercise. In a real decision process, there are many uncertainties and ambiguities, and time limitations mean that decision makers cannot always make precise judgments. The numerical example demonstrates that the fuzzy TOPSIS approach can be used to simulate the decision process in project selection, and the results provide contractors with valuable insight into the project selection problem. Originality/value - Selecting appropriate projects for bidding is to use a contractor's limited resources more efficiently and increase the probability of winning contracts. Therefore, there is a need for a quantitative method to help contractors make better decision on project selection. That leads to the formulation of this paper. The fuzzy TOPSIS method can assist contractors to make better decisions in bidding.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 315
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR MODELING BID NO-BID DECISION PROBLEM [J].
AHMAD, I .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1990, 116 (04) :595-608
[2]  
Ahmad I., 1988, J MANAG ENG, V4, P229, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1988)4:3(229)
[3]   Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 114 (01) :1-9
[4]   Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country [J].
Chen, MF ;
Tzeng, GH .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2004, 40 (13) :1473-1490
[5]  
CHEN S, 1992, LECT NOTES EC MATH S
[6]   Bid/no-bid decision-making - A fuzzy linguistic approach [J].
Lin, Ching-Torng ;
Chen, Ying-Te .
International Journal of Project Management, 2004, 22 (07) :585-593
[7]   A fuzzy TOPSIS method for robot selection [J].
Chu, TC ;
Lin, YC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 21 (04) :284-290
[8]   Facility location selection using fuzzy TOPSIS under group decisions [J].
Chu, TC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2002, 10 (06) :687-701
[9]   Key factors in bid reasoning model [J].
Chua, DKH ;
Li, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2000, 126 (05) :349-357
[10]   Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment [J].
Dagdeviren, Metin ;
Yavuz, Serkan ;
Kilinc, Nevzat .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) :8143-8151