The impact of ribavirin on real-world adherence rates in hepatitis C patients treated with sofosbuvir plus simeprevir

被引:7
作者
Walker, David R. [1 ]
Juday, Timothy R. [1 ]
Manthena, Shivaji R. [1 ]
Jing, Yonghua [1 ]
Sood, Vipan [1 ]
机构
[1] AbbVie Inc, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, N Chicago, IL USA
关键词
adherence; hepatitis C; direct acting antiviral; sofosbuvir; simeprevir; ribavirin;
D O I
10.2147/CEOR.S87261
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Combination therapy with sofosbuvir (SOF) and simeprevir (SIM) is used to treat patients with hepatitis C virus infection. It is currently unknown whether adding ribavirin (RBV) to SOF + SIM, which raises the pill count from two up to eight pills a day, impacts adherence. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of pill count on real-world adherence rates in patients treated with SOF + SIM with and without RBV. Methods: This retrospective study assessed composite adherence to SOF and SIM over 12 weeks of treatment for two cohorts of hepatitis C patients: one initiating SOF + SIM therapy, and the other initiating SOF + SIM + RBV therapy. Analyses were conducted using MarketScan((R)) and Optum US commercial pharmacy claims and enrollment data. Adherence was adjusted by treatment regimen, age, sex, co-pay, presence/absence of cirrhosis, treatment history, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results: There was a significant difference in composite unadjusted and adjusted adherence rates for SOF and SIM for the SOF + SIM vs SOF + SIM + RBV cohorts based on MarketScan data (unadjusted, 92.6% and 89.7%, respectively; P=0.0423; adjusted, 92.2% and 88.7%, respectively; P=0.0176), but not based on Optum data (unadjusted, 94.8% and 95.6%, respectively; P=0.5618; adjusted, 94.8% and 95.1%, respectively; P=0.8589). In the MarketScan and Optum databases, there were no statistical differences in unadjusted and adjusted adherence rates for SOF. Unadjusted and adjusted adherence rates for SIM were mixed, as they were for composite adherence. Conclusion: The impact of the addition of RBV to SOF + SIM therapy was mixed. The impact of RBV on SOF adherence was not significant in either database.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 642
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, SOV SOF PRESCR INF
[2]   Hepatitis C virus infection in USA: an estimate of true prevalence [J].
Chak, Eric ;
Talal, Andrew H. ;
Sherman, Kenneth E. ;
Schiff, Eugene R. ;
Saab, Sammy .
LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (08) :1090-1101
[3]   The role of ribavirin in direct acting antiviral drug regimens for chronic hepatitis C [J].
Clark, Virginia ;
Nelson, David R. .
LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 32 :103-107
[4]  
CVS Health, 2014, AN REAL WORLD SOV SO
[5]   Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003 to 2010 [J].
Denniston, Maxine M. ;
Jiles, Ruth B. ;
Drobeniuc, Jan ;
Klevens, R. Monina ;
Ward, John W. ;
McQuillan, Geraldine M. ;
Holmberg, Scott D. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 160 (05) :293-+
[6]  
Janssen Therapeutics, 2013, OL SIM PRESCR INF
[7]  
Janssen Therapeutics, 2014, OL SIM GAINS ADD FDA
[8]  
Juday TR, EASL 50 INT LIV C 20
[9]   Long-term outcome of chronic hepatitis C after sustained virological response to interferon-based therapy [J].
Koh, C. ;
Heller, T. ;
Haynes-Williams, V. ;
Hara, K. ;
Zhao, X. ;
Feld, J. J. ;
Kleiner, D. E. ;
Rotman, Y. ;
Ghany, M. G. ;
Liang, T. J. ;
Hoofnagle, J. H. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 37 (09) :887-894
[10]   What is the future of ribavirin therapy for hepatitis C? [J].
Koh, Christopher ;
Liang, T. Jake .
ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH, 2014, 104 :34-39