OF JURIES AND COURT-APPOINTED EXPERTS - THE IMPACT OF NONADVERSARIAL VERSUS ADVERSARIAL EXPERT TESTIMONY

被引：39

作者：

BREKKE, NJ ^{[1
]}

ENKO, PJ ^{[1
]}

CLAVET, G ^{[1
]}

SEELAU, E ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV VIRGINIA,DEPT PSYCHOL,CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22903

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.1037/h0093997

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：451 / 475

页数：25

共 54 条

[1] AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION, 1980, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[2] BARRETT CL, 1985, SOCIAL ACTION LAW, V11, P56
[3] BAZELON DL, 1975, J PSYCHIAT LAW, V3, P175
[4] BORGIDA E, 1985, RAPE SEXUAL ASSAULT, P313
[5] BOTTER TI, 1982, USING EXPERTS CIVIL, P53
[6] BREKKE N, 1990, UNPUB
[7] BREKKE NC, 1985, THESIS U MINNESOTA
[8] BURGESS A, 1974, AM J PSYCHIAT, V131, P980
[9] CULTURAL MYTHS AND SUPPORTS FOR RAPE
BURT, MR
[J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 38 (02) : 217 - 230
[10] Cacioppo J.T., 1981, ATTITUDES PERSUASION