OF JURIES AND COURT-APPOINTED EXPERTS - THE IMPACT OF NONADVERSARIAL VERSUS ADVERSARIAL EXPERT TESTIMONY

被引：40

作者：

BREKKE, NJ ^{[1
]}

ENKO, PJ ^{[1
]}

CLAVET, G ^{[1
]}

SEELAU, E ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV VIRGINIA,DEPT PSYCHOL,CHARLOTTESVILLE,VA 22903

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.1037/h0093997

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：451 / 475

页数：25

共 54 条

[1]

AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION, 1980, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT

[2]

BARRETT CL, 1985, SOCIAL ACTION LAW, V11, P56

[3]

BAZELON DL, 1975, J PSYCHIAT LAW, V3, P175

[4]

BORGIDA E, 1985, RAPE SEXUAL ASSAULT, P313

[5]

BOTTER TI, 1982, USING EXPERTS CIVIL, P53

[6]

BREKKE N, 1990, UNPUB

[7]

BREKKE NC, 1985, THESIS U MINNESOTA

[8]

BURGESS A, 1974, AM J PSYCHIAT, V131, P980

[9] CULTURAL MYTHS AND SUPPORTS FOR RAPE [J].

BURT, MR .

[10]

Cacioppo J.T., 1981, ATTITUDES PERSUASION