DIFFERENT MODES OF OPEN INNOVATION: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

被引:167
作者
Lazzarotti, Valentina [1 ]
Manzini, Raffaella [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carlo Cattaneo, Corso Matteotti 22, I-21053 Castellanza, Italy
关键词
Open innovation; technological collaboration; partner variety; R&D process; innovation funnel openness; modes of collaboration; innovation strategy; capabilities and processes; multiple case study; Italy;
D O I
10.1142/S1363919609002443
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Starting from the several conceptual and empirical studies about open innovation modes, this paper attempts to integrate them by suggesting a framework which reveals four basic ways to collaborate. Two variables are considered that represent the degree of openness for a company: (i) the number/type of partners with which the company collaborates, briefly labelled as "partner variety"; (ii) the number/type of phases of the innovation process that the company opens to external contributions, briefly labelled as "innovation funnel openness". By crossing these two variables, four basic modes of open innovation are identified: closed innovators, open innovators, specialized collaborators and integrated collaborators. The framework shows its practical validity in an empirical study that is conducted in Italy with the specific aim at verifying whether companies can really be mapped using this framework, i.e. whether the four modes of open innovation can be found in real companies (framework applicability); whether different modes correspond to different companies' strategies, capabilities, organisational and managerial processes (framework explicative power and usefulness). The framework shows that, in some cases, being totally open in innovation activities is not the only and most suitable option, but that different degrees and ways of "openness" can be implemented successfully, as well as the totally closed option.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 636
页数:22
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Co-designing modes of cooperation at the customer interface: learning from exploratory research [J].
Berger, Christoph ;
Moeslein, Kathrin ;
Piller, Frank ;
Reichwald, Ralf .
EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2005, 2 (01) :70-87
[2]  
Bilgram V, 2008, INT J INNOV MANAG, V12, P419, DOI 10.1142/S1363919608002096
[3]  
Chandler AD, 1990, SCALE SCOPE THEDYNAM
[4]   Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries [J].
Chesbrough, H ;
Crowther, AK .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2006, 36 (03) :229-236
[5]  
Chesbrough H., 2006, OPEN INNOVATION RES
[6]  
Chesbrough H.W., 2003, OPEN INNOVATION NEW, P1
[7]   Organizing for technological collaborations: a managerial perspective [J].
Chiesa, V ;
Manzini, R .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 1998, 28 (03) :199-212
[8]   The externalisation of R&D activities and the growing market of product development services [J].
Chiesa, V ;
Manzini, R ;
Pizzurno, E .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2004, 34 (01) :65-75
[9]   The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation -: Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics [J].
Christensen, JF ;
Olesen, MH ;
Kjær, JS .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (10) :1533-1549
[10]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152