Learning Approaches of Undergraduate Computer Technology Students: Strategies for Improvement

被引:0
|
作者
Malakolunthu, Suseela [1 ]
Joshua, Alice [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Sunway Univ, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
来源
MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF LEARNING & INSTRUCTION | 2012年 / 9卷
关键词
Higher education; computer technology; learning approaches;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose - In recent times, quality of graduates and their performance has been questioned. Students' performance is an indicator of the kind of approach (deep or surface) that is taken. This study investigates the kind of undergraduates take in their learning processes. Methodology - This quantitative survey used Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F). Sixty-three students participated in the study. Findings - Results showed no signifi cant difference between the types of approach by gender, nationality, year of study, and major. However, the rank ordering of the mean value indicated that almost all the students who participated in the study did not possess a deep approach to learning. The Pearson's r analysis revealed a weak negative statistical correlation between the deep and surface approaches to learning and weak positive statistical correlation between surface strategy and deep approach. However, a signifi cant relationship between deep strategy and deep approach (r = .903**, p < .01) was found. Significance - The lack of deep approach to learning among students can be attributed to factors such as the conditions of learning, professional capacity of teachers, and lack of instructional rigor in the program or coursework. It is imperative that emphasis is placed on using deep approaches to learning in the university courses so that deep learning experiences are created for students.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Technology-aided learning environment: An investigation into electrical/electronics students' instructional preferences, attitude and approaches to learning
    Ogbuanya, Theresa Chinyere
    Efuwape, Bamidele Michael
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2018, 38
  • [42] Analysis of cognitive learning strategies and computer attitudes, according to college students' gender and locus of control
    Kesici, Sahin
    Sahin, Ismail
    Akturk, Ahmet Oguz
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2009, 25 (02) : 529 - 534
  • [43] Developing Motivation and Cognitive Learning Strategies Through an Undergraduate Learning Community
    Candice R. Stefanou
    Jill D. Salisbury-Glennon
    Learning Environments Research, 2002, 5 (1) : 77 - 97
  • [44] Learning approaches: a comparison between 'mature' and 'conventional' business students
    Nsor-Ambala, Randolph
    JOURNAL OF FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 45 (08) : 1013 - 1032
  • [45] The predominant learning approaches of medical students
    Sonali Prashant Chonkar
    Tam Cam Ha
    Sarah Shan Hang Chu
    Ada Xinhui Ng
    Melissa Li Shan Lim
    Tat Xin Ee
    Mor Jack Ng
    Kok Hian Tan
    BMC Medical Education, 18
  • [46] Learning approaches and performance of medical students
    Rehman, Rehana
    Ahmed, Khalid
    Rehan, Rabiya
    Hassan, Farheen
    Syed, Fatima
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 66 (02) : 198 - 202
  • [47] IS RELIGION INDEPENDENT OF STUDENTS' APPROACHES TO LEARNING?
    Munoz-Garcia, Antonio
    STUDIA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2013, 55 (03) : 215 - 220
  • [48] Students' Personality Traits and Learning Approaches
    Ngidi, David P.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY IN AFRICA, 2013, 23 (01) : 149 - 152
  • [49] The predominant learning approaches of medical students
    Chonkar, Sonali Prashant
    Ha, Tam Cam
    Chu, Sarah Shan Hang
    Ng, Ada Xinhui
    Lim, Melissa Li Shan
    Ee, Tat Xin
    Ng, Mor Jack
    Tan, Kok Hian
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18
  • [50] LEARNING STYLES OF ROMANIAN UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS: A PILOT STUDY
    Dumitrescu, A. L.
    Dogaru, C. B.
    Duta, C.
    Badita, D.
    Toma, C.
    Iorgulescu, E. E.
    6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI 2013), 2013, : 3578 - 3584