NATURE VERSUS THE STATE - MARKETS, STATES, AND ENVIRONMENTAL-PROTECTION

被引:2
作者
WEALE, A [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ESSEX,COLCHESTER CO4 3SQ,ESSEX,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1080/08913819208443259
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Is it possible to reconcile a classical liberal approach to economics with a concern for the environment? The contributors to Economics and the Environment: A Reconciliation contend that it is. But they fail to distinguish properly between classical liberalism and a widespread orthodoxy in environmental policy communities in Europe and North America to the effect that economic instruments for environmental policy need more serious attention than they halle hitherto received. Once this orthodoxy is distinguished from classical liberalism, the latter is seen to be implausible. In particular, the classical liberal approach fails to deal with the practical and administrative problems involved in enforcing private property rights solutions to problems of environmental protection, wrongly generalizes from the failures of U. S. environmental policy to the failure of public regulation as such, and fails to take into account the claim that nature should be accorded intrinsic value.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 170
页数:18
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Ackerman BA., 1981, CLEAN COAL DIRTY AIR
  • [2] BARRY B, 1965, POLITICAL ARGUMENT, pCH14
  • [3] BAUMOL WJ, 1979, EC ENV POLICY QUALIT, P354
  • [4] BOEHMERCHRISTIA.S, 1991, ACID POLITICS
  • [5] BROWN GM, 1984, NAT RESOUR J, V24, P929
  • [6] Lundqvist Lennart J., 1980, HARE TORTOISE CLEAN
  • [7] Lyons David, 1965, FORMS LIMITS UTILITA
  • [8] MARIN A, 1978, J ENV EC, V5, P53
  • [9] Noss R.F., 1992, ACHIEVING ENV GOALS, P67
  • [10] Opschoor JB., 1989, EC INSTRUMENTS ENV P