Authoritarian versus critical theory

被引:8
作者
Hrubec, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Ctr Global Studies, Inst Philosophy, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
critical theory; critique; explanation; normativity;
D O I
10.1080/21598282.2012.730369
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article will analyze three fundamental elements of critical social theory: critique, explanation and normativity. It will show that only an articulation of all three elements in their mutual constitutive relations will enable them to take a crucial place in critical social theory. Firstly, it will clarify the need for critical social and political theory to have an internal character. Secondly, it will concentrate on the relations between individual elements of the above-mentioned trichotomy. Thirdly, it will deal with external social criticism. To conclude, it will explain why critical social theory is able to confront the pitfalls of authoritarian theoretical approaches which are widespread in social and political theory in the West and elsewhere.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 444
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Adorno T. W., 1950, AUTHORITARIAN PERSON
  • [2] Allen Jonathan, 1998, PHILOS SOC CRIT, V25, P25
  • [3] Bert van den Brink, 2007, RECOGNITION POWER A
  • [4] Fraser N., 2003, FRASER HONNETH
  • [5] Fraser N., 1996, JUSTICE INTERRUPTS
  • [6] Fraser Nancy, 2007, ROZVIJENI RADIKALNI, P9
  • [7] Habermas Jurgen, 1985, PHILOS DISCOURSE MOD, P106
  • [8] Honneth A, 2000, DEUT Z PHILOS, V48, P729
  • [9] Honneth A., 2000, ANDERE GERECHTIGKEIT, P237
  • [10] Honneth A., 1994, PATHOLOGIEN SOZIALEN, P9