A NEW PROLINE AMINOPEPTIDASE ASSAY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS

被引:23
作者
SCHOONMAKER, JN
LUNT, BD
LAWELLIN, DW
FRENCH, JI
HILLIER, SL
MCGREGOR, JA
机构
[1] UNIV COLORADO,HLTH SCI CTR,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL B-198,4200 E 9TH AVE,DENVER,CO 80262
[2] CHILDRENS HOSP,KEMPE RES CTR,DENVER,CO 80218
[3] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,SEATTLE,WA 98195
关键词
BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS; NONSPECIFIC VAGINITIS; MICROBIOLOGY OF THE VAGINA; ANAEROBIC BACTERIA;
D O I
10.1016/0002-9378(91)90320-Q
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Bacterial vaginosis is one of the most common occurring vaginal conditions among women of reproductive age. A rapid and reliable laboratory test for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis would be helpful in the clinical detection of this disease. Elevated proline aminopeptidase activity has been identified as a relaible marker enzyme for bacterial vaginosis. A proline aminopeptidase assay has been shown to predict accurately women with a clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. However, this assay has significant practical disadvantages, the most notable of which is the production of a carcinogenic end product, alpha-naphthylamine. We have developed a modified assay for this bacterial vaginosis marker enzyme with L-proline p-nitroanilide, a substrate that does not yield a carcinogenic end-product. The new proline aminopeptidase assay is a one-step test that is analyzed colorimetrically with microsomal leucine aminopeptidase used as a standard enzyme (linear from 3 to 125 mU per well). We have determined the activity of proline aminopeptidase in vaginal wet preparations from 57 patients with both assay methods. In addition, vaginal smears were examined with Gram's stain and analyzed for bacterial vaginosis with the Spiegel method. When compared with the Spiegel method, the two proline aminopeptidase assay methods were similar with respect to assay sensitivity (93%), specificity (91% to 93%), and the predictive value of a positive result (78% to 82%) or a negative result (97% to 98%). Vaginal wash samples also were assessed for proline aminopeptidase activity. Values for samples identified as bacterial vaginosis positive were significantly different (p < 0.0001) from those that were negative according to the Spiegel analysis of Gram's stain: negative results, 66 +/- 41 mU/ml; positive results, 704 +/- 145 mU/ml. These findings indicate that this improved proline aminopeptidase assay will offer a rapid, sensitive, and objective laboratory method for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 742
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   NONSPECIFIC VAGINITIS - DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA AND MICROBIAL AND EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASSOCIATIONS [J].
AMSEL, R ;
TOTTEN, PA ;
SPIEGEL, CA ;
CHEN, KCS ;
ESCHENBACH, D ;
HOLMES, KK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 74 (01) :14-22
[2]  
BRAND JM, 1986, OBSTET GYNECOL, V68, P682
[3]   AMINE CONTENT OF VAGINAL FLUID FROM UNTREATED AND TREATED PATIENTS WITH NONSPECIFIC VAGINITIS [J].
CHEN, KCS ;
FORSYTH, PS ;
BUCHANAN, TM ;
HOLMES, KK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1979, 63 (05) :828-835
[5]   DIAGNOSIS AND CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS [J].
ESCHENBACH, DA ;
HILLIER, S ;
CRITCHLOW, C ;
STEVENS, C ;
DEROUEN, T ;
HOLMES, KK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (04) :819-828
[6]   PERSPECTIVES ON THE BACTERIOLOGY OF POSTOPERATIVE OBSTETRIC-GYNECOLOGIC INFECTIONS [J].
FARO, S ;
PHILLIPS, LE ;
MARTENS, MG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (03) :694-700
[7]   HAEMOPHILUS VAGINALIS VAGINITIS - A NEWLY DEFINED SPECIFIC INFECTION PREVIOUSLY CLASSIFIED NONSPECIFIC VAGINITIS [J].
GARDNER, HL ;
DUKES, CD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1955, 69 (05) :962-976
[8]   PRETERM LABOR ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLINICAL AMNIOTIC-FLUID INFECTION AND WITH BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS [J].
GRAVETT, MG ;
HUMMEL, D ;
ESCHENBACH, DA ;
HOLMES, KK .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1986, 67 (02) :229-237
[9]  
GRAVETT MG, 1986, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V256, P1899
[10]   A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF CHORIOAMNIONIC INFECTION AND HISTOLOGIC CHORIOAMNIONITIS IN PREMATURITY [J].
HILLIER, SL ;
MARTIUS, J ;
KROHN, M ;
KIVIAT, N ;
HOLMES, KK ;
ESCHENBACH, DA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 319 (15) :972-978