GIS-Based Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis

被引:175
作者
Greene, Randal [1 ]
Devillers, Rodolphe [2 ]
Luther, Joan E. [3 ]
Eddy, Brian G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Geog, St John, NF A1B 3X9, Canada
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Geog, Dept Earth Sci, St John, NF, Canada
[3] Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Serv, Sidney, BC, Canada
基金
加拿大创新基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00431.x
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Important and complex spatial decisions, such as allocating land to development or conservation-oriented goals, require information and tools to aid in understanding the inherent tradeoffs. They also require mechanisms for incorporating and documenting the value judgements of interest groups and decision makers. Multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a family of techniques that aid decision makers in formally structuring multi-faceted decisions and evaluating the alternatives. It has been used for about two decades with geographic information systems (GIS) to analyse spatial problems. However, the variety and complexity of MCDA methods, with their varying terminologies, means that this rich set of tools is not easily accessible to the untrained. This paper provides background for GIS users, analysts and researchers to quickly get up to speed on MCDA, supporting the ultimate goal of making it more accessible to decision makers. A number of factors for describing MCDA problems and selecting methods are outlined then simplified into a decision tree, which organises an introduction of key methods. Approaches range from mathematical programming and heuristic algorithms for simultaneously optimising multiple goals, to more common single-objective techniques based on weighted addition of criteria values, attainment of criteria thresholds, or outranking of alternatives. There is substantial research that demonstrates ways to couple GIS with multi-criteria methods, and to adapt MCDA for use in spatially continuous problems. Increasing the accessibility of GIS-based MCDA provides new opportunities for researchers and practitioners, including web-based participation and advanced visualisation of decision processes.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 432
页数:21
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Aerts J. C. J. H., 2005, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, V48, P121, DOI 10.1080/0964056042000308184
[2]  
Anderson D., 2003, INTRO MANAGEMENT SCI, Vtenth
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, EC NATURE MANAGING B
[4]   Spatial based compromise programming for multiple criteria decision making in land use planning [J].
Baja, Sumbangan ;
Chapman, David M. ;
Dragovich, Deirdre .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (03) :171-184
[5]  
Balram S, 2006, COLLABORATIVE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, P1, DOI 10.4018/978-1-59140-845-1
[6]  
Belton V., 2002, MULTIPLE CRITERIA DE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-1495-4
[7]   GIS and Intelligent Agents for Multiobjective Natural Resource Allocation: A Reinforcement Learning Approach [J].
Bone, Christopher ;
Dragicevic, Suzana .
TRANSACTIONS IN GIS, 2009, 13 (03) :253-272
[8]   Measuring consensus for collaborative decision-making: A GIS-based approach [J].
Boroushaki, Soheil ;
Malczewski, Jacek .
COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2010, 34 (04) :322-332
[9]   Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS [J].
Boroushaki, Sohell ;
Malczewski, Jacek .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2008, 34 (04) :399-410
[10]  
Bouyssou D, 2006, EVALUATION DECISION