INTEGRAL THEORY A Poisoned Chalice?

被引:4
作者
Rutzou, Timothy [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Educ, London, England
关键词
actualism; critical realism; integral theory; Kant; metaRealism; ontology; postmetaphysics; violence; Wittgenstein;
D O I
10.1558/jcr.v11i2.215
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In light of the recent symposium, this paper analyses integral theory through original and dialectical critical realism. This paper maintains that integral theory is unable to sustain its critique against modernity and postmodernity as a result of the adoption of Kantian, Hegelian and Heideggerian ontology. The resulting actualism and structure perpetrates ontological violence, as it attempts to resolve the problems of modernity and postmodernity. An adoption of critical realism as under-labourer would call into question many of the theoretical underpinnings of integral theory resulting in a serious re-evaluation of its core features.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 224
页数:10
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Bhaskar R., 1975, REALIST THEORY SCI
  • [2] Bhaskar R, 2002, SCI EMANCIPATION
  • [3] Bhaskar R., 2008, DIALECTIC PULSE FREE
  • [4] Esbjorn-Hargens S., 2010, J INTEGRAL THEORY PR, V5, P143
  • [5] Esbjorn-Hargens S., 2006, RELIG AND SCI, P523
  • [6] Hegel Georg W. F., 1991, ELEMENTS PHILOS RIGH
  • [7] THE MEETING OF TWO INTEGRATIVE METATHEORIES
    Marshall, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REALISM, 2012, 11 (02) : 188 - 214
  • [8] Wilber K., 2006, INTEGRAL SPIRITUALIT