It's More Than a Blood Test: Patients' Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing

被引:32
作者
Farrell, Ruth M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mercer, Mary Beth [1 ]
Agatisa, Patricia K. [1 ]
Smith, Marissa B. [3 ]
Philipson, Elliot [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Bioeth, 9500 Euclid Ave JJ60, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Womens Hlth Inst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Ctr Personalized Genet Healthcare, Genom Med Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE | 2014年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
noninvasive prenatal testing; patients' perspectives; patient decision making;
D O I
10.3390/jcm3020614
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) offers pregnant women a new risk assessment tool for fetal aneuploidy that is superior to conventional screening tests. We conducted focus groups with women who were currently pregnant or had recently delivered in the past year to characterize their perspectives about NIPT and to explore factors they would consider during decision making about its use. Women identified accuracy, early timing, testing ease, and determination of fetal sex as advantages of NIPT over other screens, and the noninvasive method of NIPT as an advantage over diagnostic tests. False positive and false negative results, anxiety, cost and insurance coverage were seen as disadvantages of NIPT. Women who do not want fetal aneuploidy information most likely will not undergo NIPT, despite its advantages over other screening tests. However, given its advantages, the decision to have NIPT is straightforward for women who want genetic information about the fetus. Women emphasized the need to make autonomous, private, and informed choices about NIPT, as they would with any prenatal genetic testing option. These perspectives may guide clinicians to conduct effective and clinically relevant counseling with pregnant women who consider utilizing this new genetic technology.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 631
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [31] Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake
    Tischler, Reana
    Hudgins, Louanne
    Blumenfeld, Yair J.
    Greely, Henry T.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (13) : 1292 - 1299
  • [32] Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionals
    van den Heuvel, Ananda
    Chitty, Lyn
    Dormandy, Elizabeth
    Newson, Ainsley
    Deans, Zuzana
    Attwood, Sophie
    Haynes, Shelley
    Marteau, Theresa M.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 78 (01) : 24 - 28