Influence of increment of gantry angle and number of arcs on esophageal volumetric modulated arc therapy planning in Monaco planning system: A planning study

被引:6
作者
Nithya, L. [1 ]
Raj, N. Arunai Nambi [2 ]
Rathinamuthu, Sasikumar [1 ]
Sharma, Kanika [1 ]
Pandey, Manish Bhushan [1 ]
机构
[1] Dharamshila Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Delhi, India
[2] Vellore Inst Technol Univ, Sch Adv Sci, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Esophagus cases; increment of gantry angle; number of arcs; VMAT;
D O I
10.4103/0971-6203.144488
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of the increment of gantry angle and the number of arcs on esophageal volumetric modulated arc therapy plan. All plans were done in Monaco planning system for Elekta Synergy linear accelerator with 80 multileaf collimator (MLC). Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were done with different increment of gantry angle like 15 degrees , 20 degrees , 30 degrees and 40 degrees . The remaining parameters were similar for all the plans. The results were compared. To compare the plan quality with number of arcs, VMAT plans were done with single and dual arc with increment of gantry angle of 20 degrees . The dose to gross tumor volume (GTV) for 60 Gy and planning target volume (PTV) for 48 Gy was compared. The dosimetric parameters D-98% , D-95% , D-50% and D-max of GTV were analyzed. The homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of GTV were studied and the dose to 98% and 95% of PTV was analyzed. Maximum dose to spinal cord and planning risk volume of cord (PRV cord) was compared. The Volume of lung receiving 10 Gy, 20 Gy and mean dose was analyzed. The volume of heart receiving 30 Gy and 45 Gy was compared. The volume of normal tissue receiving greater than 2 Gy and 5 Gy was compared. The number of monitor units (MU) required to deliver the plans were compared. The plan with larger increment of gantry angle proved to be superior to smaller increment of gantry angle plans in terms of dose coverage, HI, CI and normal tissue sparing. The number of arcs did not make any difference in the quality of the plan.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 237
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer [J].
Abbas, Ahmar S. ;
Moseley, Douglas ;
Kassam, Zahra ;
Kim, Sun Mo ;
Cho, Charles .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (03) :192-202
[2]   Volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for distal oesophageal malignancies [J].
Hawkins, M. A. ;
Bedford, J. L. ;
Warrington, A. P. ;
Tait, D. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1009) :44-52
[3]  
Impac Medical Systems Inc, 2013, MON TRAIN GUID
[4]   The use and QA of biologically related models for treatment planning: Short report of the TG-166 of the therapy physics committee of the AAPMa) [J].
Li, X. Allen ;
Alber, Markus ;
Deasy, Joseph O. ;
Jackson, Andrew ;
Jee, Kyung-Wook Ken ;
Marks, Lawrence B. ;
Martel, Mary K. ;
Mayo, Charles ;
Moiseenko, Vitali ;
Nahum, Alan E. ;
Niemierko, Andrzej ;
Semenenko, Vladimir A. ;
Yorke, Ellen D. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (03) :1386-1409
[5]   The effect of gantry spacing resolution on plan quality in a single modulated arc optimization [J].
Mihaylov, Ivaylo B. ;
Curran, Bruce ;
Sternick, Edward .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 12 (04) :175-184
[6]   A quantitative analysis of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans and comparison of homogeneity indices for the treatment of gynecological cancers [J].
Pathak, Pushpraj ;
Vashisht, Sanjeev .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 38 (02) :67-73
[7]   VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY VS. IMRT FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISTAL ESOPHAGEAL CANCER [J].
Van Benthuysen, Liam ;
Hales, Lee ;
Podgorsak, Matthew B. .
MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2011, 36 (04) :404-409
[8]   Sensitivity analysis of physics and planning SmartArc parameters for single and partial arc VMAT planning [J].
Yang, Kai ;
Yan, Di ;
Tyagi, Neelam .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 13 (06) :34-45
[9]   Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: A treatment planning comparison [J].
Yin, Li ;
Wu, Hao ;
Gong, Jian ;
Geng, Jian-Hao ;
Jiang, Fan ;
Shi, An-Hui ;
Yu, Rong ;
Li, Yong-Heng ;
Han, Shu-Kui ;
Xu, Bo ;
Zhu, Guang-Ying .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (37) :5266-5275
[10]  
[No title captured]