Survival Implications Associated with Variation in Mastectomy Rates for Early-Staged Breast Cancer

被引:29
作者
Brooks, John M. [1 ]
Chrischilles, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Landrum, Mary Beth [3 ]
Wright, Kara B. [2 ]
Fang, Gang [4 ]
Winer, Eric P. [5 ]
Keating, Nancy L. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Coll Pharm, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[5] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02120 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2012/127854
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Despite a 20-year-old guideline from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference recommending breast conserving surgery with radiation (BCSR) over mastectomy for woman with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) because it preserves the breast, recent evidence shows mastectomy rates increasing and higher-staged ESBC patients are more likely to receive mastectomy. These observations suggest that some patients and their providers believe that mastectomy has advantages over BCSR and these advantages increase with stage. These beliefs may persist because the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that served as the basis for the NIH guideline were populated mainly with lower-staged patients. Our objective is to assess the survival implications associated with mastectomy choice by patient alignment with the RCT populations. We used instrumental variable methods to estimate the relationship between surgery choice and survival for ESBC patients based on variation in local area surgery styles. We find results consistent with the RCTs for patients closely aligned to the RCT populations. However, for patients unlike those in the RCTs, our results suggest that higher mastectomy rates are associated with reduced survival. We are careful to interpret our estimates in terms of limitations of our estimation approach.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087
[2]  
Angrist JD, 1996, J AM STAT ASSOC, V91, P444, DOI 10.2307/2291629
[3]   Treatment effect heterogeneity in theory and practice [J].
Angrist, JD .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2004, 114 (494) :C52-C83
[4]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[5]   Instrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments [J].
Angrist, JD ;
Krueger, AB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (04) :69-85
[6]   Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice [J].
Angrist, JD .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2001, 19 (01) :2-16
[7]   TESTS FOR LINEAR TRENDS IN PROPORTIONS AND FREQUENCIES [J].
ARMITAGE, P .
BIOMETRICS, 1955, 11 (03) :375-386
[8]   Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: Patterns of failure with 15 years of follow-up data [J].
Arriagada, R ;
Le, MG ;
Rochard, F ;
Contesso, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (05) :1558-1564
[9]   Use of instrumental variables in the presence of heterogeneity and self-selection: An application to treatments of breast cancer patients [J].
Basu, Anirban ;
Heckman, James J. ;
Navarro-Lozano, Salvador ;
Urzua, Sergio .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 16 (11) :1133-1157
[10]   Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable [J].
Brookhart, MA ;
Wang, PS ;
Solomon, DH ;
Schneeweiss, S .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (03) :268-275