DISPERSAL AND DYNAMICS

被引:139
作者
DOEBELI, M
机构
[1] Zoology Institute, University of Basel, CH-405I Basel
关键词
D O I
10.1006/tpbi.1995.1004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Mixing and asynchrony of interactions can be expected to stabilize the dynamics of populations. One way such mixing occurs is by dispersal, and Hastings and Gyllenberg et al. have shown that symmetric dispersal between two local populations governed by logistic difference equations can simplify the dynamics. These results are extended here by using a more flexible difference equation and allowing asymmetric dispersal. Although there are some instances where dispersal is destabilizing, its stabilizing effect is enhanced by asymmetry. In addition, very high dispersal rates can induce a stable equilibrium of the metapopulation despite highly chaotic local dynamics. If this equilibrium loses stability, the route to intermittent chaos can be observed. Two new conditions under which dispersal can be stabilizing are discussed. One occurs when the timing of reproduction and dispersal differs in the two patches of the metapopulation. This enlarges the asynchrony of the interactions, and simple dynamics due to dispersal are more likely. The second works by slightly adjusting dispersal rates to control chaotic dynamics. The control can replace chaos by a stable equilibrium. The evolution of dispersal rates is discussed. Since obtaining general criteria for invasion into a population with chaotic dynamics is difficult, no clear conclusions are possible as to whether evolution leads to more stable metapopulations. However, a mutant that controls chaos can invade a resident having the same local dynamics but no control mechanism, so that evolution can lead from chaos to a stable equilibrium. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 106
页数:25
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   THE DESCRIPTIVE PROPERTIES OF SOME MODELS FOR DENSITY DEPENDENCE [J].
BELLOWS, TS .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1981, 50 (01) :139-156
[2]   ARE ECOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS CHAOTIC - AND IF NOT, WHY NOT [J].
BERRYMAN, AA ;
MILLSTEIN, JA .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1989, 4 (01) :26-28
[3]   THE SPATIAL DYNAMICS OF HOST PARASITOID SYSTEMS [J].
COMINS, HN ;
HASSELL, MP ;
MAY, RM .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1992, 61 (03) :735-748
[4]   THE EVOLUTIONARY ADVANTAGE OF CONTROLLED CHAOS [J].
DOEBELI, M .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1993, 254 (1341) :281-285
[5]   INTERMITTENT CHAOS IN POPULATION-DYNAMICS [J].
DOEBELI, M .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1994, 166 (03) :325-330
[6]  
DOEBELI M, 1995, IN PRESS J THEOR BIO
[7]  
GILPIN ME, 1991, METAPOPULATION DYNAM
[8]   CHAOS, METAPOPULATIONS AND DISPERSAL [J].
GONZALEZANDUJAR, JL ;
PERRY, JN .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1993, 65 (3-4) :255-263
[9]   DOES MIGRATION STABILIZE LOCAL-POPULATION DYNAMICS - ANALYSIS OF A DISCRETE METAPOPULATION MODEL [J].
GYLLENBERG, M ;
SODERBACKA, G ;
ERICSSON, S .
MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 1993, 118 (01) :25-49
[10]   SINGLE-SPECIES METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS - CONCEPTS, MODELS AND OBSERVATIONS [J].
HANSKI, I .
BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1991, 42 (1-2) :17-38