Improvement in clinical step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery accuracy on an integrated linear accelerator control system

被引:15
作者
Agnew, C. E. [1 ]
Irvine, D. M. [1 ]
Hounsell, A. R. [1 ,2 ]
McGarry, C. K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Belfast Hlth & Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland Canc Ctr, Radiotherapy Phys, Belfast BT9 7AB, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Canc Res & Cell Biol, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prro.2013.07.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The dose delivery accuracy of 30 clinical step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy plans was investigated using the single integrated multileaf collimator controller of the Varian Truebeam linear accelerator (linac) (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) and compared with the dose delivery accuracy on a previous generation Varian 2100CD C-Series linac. Methods and Materials: Ten prostate, 10 prostate and pelvic node, and 10 head-and-neck cases were investigated in this study. Dose delivery accuracy on each linac was assessed using Farmer ionization chamber point dose measurements, 2-dimensional planar ionization chamber array measurements, and the corresponding Varian dynamic log files. Absolute point dose measurements, fluence delivery accuracy, leaf position accuracy, and the overshoot effect were assessed for each plan. Results: Absolute point dose delivery accuracy increased by 1.5% on the Truebeam compared with the 2100CD linac. No improvement in fluence delivery accuracy between the linacs, at a gamma criterion of 3%/3 mm was measured using the 2-dimensional ionization chamber array, with median (interquartile range) gamma passing rates of 98.99% (97.70%-99.72%) and 99.28% (98.26%-99.75%) for the Truebeam and 2100CD linacs, respectively. Varian log files also showed no improvement in fluence delivery between the linacs at 3%/3 mm, with median gamma passing rates of 99.97% (99.93%-99.99%) and 99.98% (99.94%-100%) for the Truebeam and 2100CD linacs, respectively. However, log files revealed improved leaf position accuracy and fluence delivery at 1%/1 mm criterion on the Truebeam (99.87%; 99.78%-99.94%) compared with the 2100CD linac (97.87%; 91.93%-99.49%). The overshoot effect, characterized on the 2100CD linac, was not observed on the Truebeam. Conclusions: The integrated multileaf collimator controller on the Varian Truebeam improves clinical treatment delivery accuracy of step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy fields compared with delivery on a Varian C-series linac. (C) 2014 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output [J].
Agnew, C. E. ;
King, R. B. ;
Hounsell, A. R. ;
McGarry, C. K. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (21) :6761-6777
[2]   Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial [J].
Dearnaley, David ;
Syndikus, Isabel ;
Sumo, Georges ;
Bidmead, Margaret ;
Bloomfield, David ;
Clark, Catharine ;
Gao, Annie ;
Hassan, Shama ;
Horwich, Alan ;
Huddart, Robert ;
Khoo, Vincent ;
Kirkbride, Peter ;
Mayles, Helen ;
Mayles, Philip ;
Naismith, Olivia ;
Parker, Chris ;
Patterson, Helen ;
Russell, Martin ;
Scrase, Christopher ;
South, Chris ;
Staffurth, John ;
Hall, Emma .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (01) :43-54
[3]  
Dolan J, 2012, AAPM 54 ANN M
[4]  
Ezzell G A, 2001, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V2, P138, DOI 10.1120/1.1386508
[5]   IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119 [J].
Ezzell, Gary A. ;
Burmeister, Jay W. ;
Dogan, Nesrin ;
LoSasso, Thomas J. ;
Mechalakos, James G. ;
Mihailidis, Dimitris ;
Molineu, Andrea ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Ramsey, Chester R. ;
Salter, Bill J. ;
Shi, Jie ;
Xia, Ping ;
Yue, Ning J. ;
Xiao, Ying .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) :5359-5373
[6]   A NATIONAL PHASE III TRIAL OF PELVIC LYMPH NODE (LN) IMRT IN PROSTATE CANCER (PIVOTAL): A COMPARISON OF LN OUTLINING METHODS [J].
Harris, V. ;
South, C. ;
Cruickshank, C. ;
Dearnaley, D. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 :S486-S487
[7]   Improving delivery of segments with small MU in step-and-shoot IMRT [J].
Kuperman, VY ;
Lam, WC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (04) :1067-1073
[8]   Improvements in dose accuracy delivered with static-MLC IMRT on an integrated linear accelerator control system [J].
Li, Ji ;
Wiersma, Rodney D. ;
Stepaniak, Christopher J. ;
Farrey, Karl J. ;
Al-Hallaq, Hania A. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (05) :2456-2462
[9]   CODE OF PRACTICE FOR HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON THERAPY DOSIMETRY BASED ON THE NPL ABSORBED DOSE CALIBRATION SERVICE [J].
LILLICRAP, SC ;
OWEN, B ;
WILLIAMS, JR ;
WILLIAMS, PC .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (10) :1355-1360
[10]  
Litzenberg Dale W, 2002, J Appl Clin Med Phys, V3, P63, DOI 10.1120/1.1449362